M/S Vintech Agros India Pvt Ltd vs Nil on 16 December, 2009

flVTfiEIHGH(ENHIFOFIUMflWMHHULNTBANGALORE
DATEDTEHSTEHE16"VDAY(fl?DECEMBERq2009

BEFORE

THE z~ION'I3LE MR. JUSTICE RAM  -_ K

COMPANY APPLICATION NO.356 OEEGGQQ "   "

COMPANY PETITION NO;1--O5 OE _199s_  C'

BETWEEN:

REPRESENTED BY OFFICIAL LIQUID.ATOR,"  --
HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA,     
CORPORATE BH.AvAN,. 12?" FI.DOR,S--.RAREJA TOWERS,
NO.26--27, M.G. ROAD,  _   ~- 
EANGALORE560 001.     ...APPLICANT.

M/S. VINTECH AGROS INDIA'Pxf1';..LTD.A,"'gR\I ILLQ:    

(SR1. DEEPAK_ 85 SR1.  IrO'R OL)

ANDE,

I NIL. "   I'  ...RESPONDENT.

5 » '{ffiIS'4.COv1\/IP;'5INY ;AP..I"LICA'E'ION IS FILED UNDER SECTION
 COMPI4.-NIES ACT, 1956 READ WITH RULES 1.}.{b)

_ I AND 298_OaE«TRE COMPANIES (COURT) RULES, 1956 PRAYING
  A1'2I5O.IvNTV"AvN~~AUDI1OR T0 AUDIT THE ACCOUNTS OF THE
'OFFIC:AL'I';IgUIDATOR FOR THE HALF' YEAR ENDING 31w03--

2009 ANDTIX I-IIS REMUNERATION AND TO PASS ORDERS AS

_  AAREGARSS THE REQUIREMENT OF SECTION 462(5) OF THE
 .COMpANIES ACT. 1956.§
. .. fig

gig



THIS CA COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOVVING: 

ORDER

Auditor’s report is axzceptecgim and his’fé:e.. ‘inn 9

terms of the order dated ‘

No.21 1/2007. The requirérmgnt gage; Se}§§fiQ11.._46f_3.[5] of *

the Companies Act, 1956 is__fi:1Vi:s1’3_er1fsed.

Company appliga_t'ic§;1  

%  m: {       JUDGE

KS_§  "