M/S Vishnu Flour Mills vs The Deputy Commissioner on 27 May, 2009

0
74
Karnataka High Court
M/S Vishnu Flour Mills vs The Deputy Commissioner on 27 May, 2009
Author: N.K.Patil
méazm ma» mwmmmm mam agmzumg mar amammmam. a-mm mmwm: W-* amamm.m.em 9-mm a:..:<s.::mm Q? MRMAEAM MIQH 601.5%' 05 MRNAYAM HIGH COUK

{H TI-E HIGH CCKIRT OF' KARNATAKA AT 

mmn ms THE 23% my <31? my  % 

THE I-IC}R'BLE    _

WRIT PETETION Ho,aa;o6/2963 [GM   %   

BF/I'V7EEH:

M[a.\fmhnuF'k:urMi}1s;_  -  

having factary at Sy.E.Q4_~f'2  1 "  
 ~Hc§k9m.« 1;. V
Bangalore R1;111a1-é"5fi'2~--3;j§,'§.:--..,. = 

Ishya   '  . :  ~ ~ .. _ 
#4, 10* P: 1.1-*A£ir{;i's:.s,
Parallel to '£90 Fwt 154%'-:>a'd.

 E "Sta.ge,,

 '  its Pj
' $13  .. PE'ITI'{C3HER

   Tim Deputy Can1mm' inner,

Banwre Ruml Dismmt,
Banmra.

2. The Iiheputy Qh'a§<'% €303.33

 

Aéiw Kfia%Nfl"§"fiK& W3" CQUK? 0%' KARNWTAKA H56?! CODE"? 0? KARNWf'M("A MGM fifififi? W? K&RNflY&%fi

K}
x
Q
m
§
§
i
2
X
E
is
§
§
E
E.
g

3. The Deputy Direcbor(Sum.V},
Food as Civil Supplies Deparmm,
 .

4- Fmdkwpwtnr. %
F0-od&C.:iv§1 Suwfiwm _’ ” ‘
Barwkrefiural

5. Food Shireathjdar, ‘ X

Foodami Civil Su.pp1i@’ ._ _ ,_

Hnskzczte . ”

..

my sri H T

Articlm me and
227′ of ‘India, praym no quash the

8..1_~..20Qj6~-.._d’:rawn by the rmpondents
Ha.4& 5 and aeimzxe n&c1:ed
there.-u_r_1der i”.:-3. as arbétzrary, illegal, unjust
ab-“infitics and quash the c-rdcr ‘

*Eo.E«’4;?E1.£3A/SRIE-4i’;”2i3£3’7»D8 dated 2.4.2903 passed by
t7c§e:«..1** La. A and all furthar
6:1 file cvf the Deputy Cammnfisioner,

Bangaiofe Dhtfint i.e.t1:x=1st rwpondant in
R33; 1~Io.F=4]ECA]CR/64[2007-68 as

V petitioner ufier Secfmn 65 cf the Esaemial
Act as arbitrary, illegal, unjust and wid-
: ‘

Writ Fetifion m:mJng’ am for ‘ ‘

f_ this day, the Court mafia the fallowm:

GREEK

Thn psfifinner queafwnirxg tho: eorrectnms cf thn

malwr damd $.1.2 by respondents No.4

.rs,;:%;:M.Me:’E am-« mmmmm mm: mm? as mmmmm mm mm

and 5 and the csznrmequential aedmre eflbctcd

ab-initia and also aasailing the

dam 2.42% Pm

mssed by the 1” rcspendcnt. ,

on the file 9f the amalgam.-

District as under
Section 6A of Act as
arbfirary, % ab-mic, has

prams
:2. I ho~a:1″ : for the petitinmr
and appearizg fin’ the

….. V’ «

had mm up fior firm’ on

24.4.2cos@igguzeos, um Caurt after mm’ both

‘ the in1:m’un’ order pmmn:t1ng’ ‘ the perm ‘ next

the bank guarantee far Rm lamca the:

n 9f 12% 1″ rm-pandmt. C)n auhmitfi the

guarantee. the 1″ rmpondant: was d1recta:i’ to

mwwnmfi mm w»am~umm~m:wm n:we’wI”i wvwni Iwna” mmnuumammm nawm wwmmd Mr’ Ewuamfliflfifl i”‘M€§:.::é:3

pemzfi the petitioner to taim passaession oftim seized

,2 “””‘””°””””””””‘””‘*==’~w=-s-s
£1

§’~%§§”§%~% fifiiffi

‘A….~=&..£”M’l’2’ME MW” mmmwfliflflfl fi”fiE%..;iaiLb”fg

mmmmm H%@H mwm” WF WRWATAKA W5!-I COURT WP KflWNA’?&KA Wfifl €;'”30UW’ 0? §€fiRN&”¥,£%,..~*><:

wheat. Betiaom waa permitted ta submit tlifibgnk

guaranthm 'an the satisfaction at' the 1'?
within arm week. Thu: raapondsma .,

take any taps in rmpect cf

that: said interim ordm ,

has not completed the the
matter pmding in without
wzwairg the case, the
writ pefinam aimcaan to tha
No.F4IECa.J%k¢%:a1:s§44} % afier afibrding an

»~ as acpadiwsusly as

" _ pagajiiifi, at a period 31' @111: ween from

:11' um ordacsr. rm mpondmts am %

V any steps in rwpectt of seized w&at

V L % this Caurt by its mm clamd 24.4.2003.

passed by this Court on 24,4.2ma is

f a9nu–nm can an: wesakz, if tha patmoxm have
V Hgarmpiied with the cmnditicxzal arder."

Sci/-=
fudge
Bkm.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *