M/S vs Union on 21 October, 2011

Gujarat High Court
M/S vs Union on 21 October, 2011
Author: Akil Kureshi, Gokani,
  
 Gujarat High Court Case Information System 
    
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

MCA/2685/2011	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

 


 

MISC.CIVIL
APPLICATION - FOR ORDERS No. 2685 of 2011
 

In


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 10742 of 2011
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

M/S
IMROSE TRADERS - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

UNION
OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY & 2 - Opponent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
PARESH M DAVE
for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
None for Opponent(s) : 1, 
MR RJ OZA for
Opponent(s) : 2 -
3. 
=========================================================
 

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

 HONOURABLE
			MS JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI    21st October 2011
		
	

 

 ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)

Learned
counsel Mr. Oza appeared on behalf of the respondents on advance
copy. This application, in fact, was notified yesterday for hearing.
After brief discussion, at our request, learned counsel Mr. Oza
conveyed to the respondents; and in particular respondents no. 2 &
3 that the imposition of condition of providing bank guarantee, only
after which the goods will be cleared, runs counter to our directions
contained in Order dated 9th
September 2011. We noted that learned counsel Mr. Oza has been able
to prevail over the respondents and today,
within less than twenty four hours, he has ensured that proper
corrective steps are taken by the respondents. In furtherance to
this, he places on record a communication dated 20th
October 2011, by virtue of which, the goods of the applicant are
ordered to be released provisionally. In so far as the application is
concerned, the prayers stand satisfied.

We
might have examined the issue of ignoring the Court’s order further,
however, in view of unconditional apology tendered by Shri Sanket
Kale, on behalf of the authority who had passed the order, as also
the assurance of learned counsel Mr. Oza that the Court’s anguish and
annoyance will be conveyed to the concerned officer, we close the
issue.

In
view of the developments noted above, no further order is passed in
this Misc. Civil Application. The same stands disposed of
accordingly.

{Akil
Kureshi, J.}

{Ms.

Sonia Gokani, J.}

Prakash*

   

Top

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *