Posted On by &filed under High Court, Kerala High Court.


Kerala High Court
Muhammadali vs State Of Kerala on 20 December, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 8224 of 2010()


1. MUHAMMADALI, AGED 35 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.SUNILKUMAR

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

 Dated :20/12/2010

 O R D E R
                         V. RAMKUMAR, J.
               .........................................
                      B.A. No.8224 of 2010
               ..........................................
           Dated this the 20th day of December, 2010

                                ORDER

Petitioner, who is the sole accused in Crime No.298/2010 of

Kuruppampady Police Station for offences punishable under

Sections 498A and 406 I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the

application.

3. After evaluating the factors and parameters which

are to be taken into consideration in the light of paragraph 122

of the verdict dated 2-12-2010 of the Apex Court in

Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra

and Others (Crl.Appeal No. 2271 of 2010), I am of the view

that anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature,

since the investigating officer has not had the advantage of

interrogating the petitioner. But at the same time, I am

inclined to permit the petitioner to surrender before the

Investigating Officer for the purpose of interrogation and then to

have his application for bail allowed by the Magistrate or the

B.A.No.8224 /2010 -:2:-

Court having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitioner shall

surrender before the investigating officer on 30.12.2010 or on

31.12.2010 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of

incriminating material, if any. In case the investigating officer

is of the view that having regard to the facts of the case arrest

of the petitioner is imperative he shall record his reasons for

the arrest in the case diary as insisted in paragraph 129 of

Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre’s case (supra). The

petitioner shall thereafter be produced before the Magistrate or

the Court concerned and permitted to file an application for

regular bail. In case the interrogation of the petitioner is

without arresting him, the petitioner shall thereafter appear

before the Magistrate or the Court concerned and apply for

regular bail. The Magistrate or the Court on being satisfied that

the petitioner has been interrogated by the police shall, after

hearing the prosecution as well, release the petitioner on bail.

4. In case the petitioner while surrendering before the

Investigating Officer has deprived the investigating officer

sufficient time for interrogation, the officer shall complete the

interrogation even if it is beyond the time limit fixed as above

B.A.No.8224 /2010 -:3:-

and submit a report to that effect to the Magistrate or the

Court concerned. Likewise, the Magistrate or the Court also

will not be bound by the time limit fixed as above if sufficient

time was not available after the production or appearance of

the petitioner.

5. The release of the petitioner shall be on the

petitioner executing a bond for `15,000/- (Rupees fifteen

thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount

to the satisfaction of the Court concerned and subject to the

following conditions:-

1. The petitioner shall report before the

Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all

Wednesdays.

2. The petitioner shall make himself available for

interrogation including custodial interrogation as and

when required by the Investigating Officer.

3. Petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the

prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper

with the evidence for the prosecution.

B.A.No.8224 /2010 -:4:-

4. Petitioner shall not commit any offence while on

bail.

5. If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above

conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be

cancelled.

This petition is disposed of as above.

Dated this the 20th .day of December, 2010.

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

sj


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

66 queries in 0.151 seconds.