High Court Kerala High Court

Muhammed Ashraf vs State Through Pariyaram Medical on 16 August, 2010

Kerala High Court
Muhammed Ashraf vs State Through Pariyaram Medical on 16 August, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 4315 of 2010()


1. MUHAMMED ASHRAF, S/O. KHALID, AGED 42,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. UNAIZ M.V.S/O.ABDUL SALAM, AGED 26,
3. UMAIR @ UMMER, S/O. AHAMMED, AGED 38,

                        Vs



1. STATE THROUGH PARIYARAM MEDICAL
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.A.SATHEESH

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA

 Dated :16/08/2010

 O R D E R
                              K.HEMA, J.
                           ------------------
                        B.A. No. 4315 of 2010
                  ------------------------------------
                Dated this the 16th day of August, 2010

                              O R D E R

Petition for bail.

2. The alleged offences are under Sections 143, 147, 148,

452, 427, 428, 324, 395 and 506(i) read with Section 149 of the

Indian Penal Code. According to prosecution, petitioners(accused

nos.2 , 12 and 15 respectively) along with other accused (total 15 in

nos), formed themselves into an unlawful assembly and committed

house trespass into the house of the de facto complainant and

committed mischief by breaking the window glasses etc. They also

assaulted the de facto complainant using sticks and committed theft

of 5= sovereigns of gold, Rs. 8000/- and 35 kgs of pepper. The

incident happened on 29.05.2010 at about 3.30 P.M.

3. Learned counsel for petitioners submitted that accused nos.

1 and 15 were arrested on 29.06.2010 and accused no.12 was

arrested on 30.06.2010 and they are in custody for the past 49 and

48 days respectively.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that taking into

consideration, the general allegations made against petitioners, this

petition is not opposed, but stringent conditions may be imposed, it

is submitted.

B.A. No. 4315 / 2010 2

5. On hearing both sides, I am satisfied that bail can be

granted to petitioners on conditions. Hence the following order is

passed:

Petitioners shall be released on bail on their

executing bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty

thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for

the like sum to the satisfaction of the Magistrate

Court concerned on the following conditions:

i) Petitioners shall report before the
Investigating Officer on every Monday,
Wednesday and Saturday, between 10
A.M. and 1 P.M.

ii) Petitioners shall not enter the limits of the
police station within which the crime is
registered, except for compliance of
condition no.1.

iii) Petitioners shall not influence or intimidate
any witness or tamper with the evidence.

iv) In case, petitioners are involved in any
similar offence, their bail is liable to be
cancelled.

This petition is allowed.

K. HEMA, JUDGE
ln