IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 14099 of 2009(F)
1. MUHAMMED MUSTHAFA,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTNDENT OF POLICE,
... Respondent
2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
3. KRISHNAKUMAR, S/O. M.D. NAIR,
For Petitioner :SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.BHAVADASAN
Dated :26/05/2009
O R D E R
P.R.RAMAN & P.BHAVADASAN, JJ.
-------------------------------
W.P.(C) No. 14099 of 2009
-------------------------------
Dated this the 26th May, 2009
J U D G M E N T
Raman, J.
The allegation of the petitioner is that in a civil
dispute pending between him and the third respondent, police is
interfering and asking the petitioner to come to the police station.
The allegation that he is asked to come to the police station is not
supported by any material produced. However, the fact remains
that no complaint as such is received by the police from any
quarter against the petitioner, and as such, the presence of the
petitioner is not required at present. Needless to say that if,
towards an enquiry or investigation, the presence of a party is
required, the police will have to refer to the provisions contained
in Section 160 of Code of Criminal Procedure and issue notice
W.P.(C) No.14099 of 2009
2
asking for such appearance.
With the above observation, the writ petition is
closed.
P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE
P.BHAVADASAN , JUDGE.
nj.