Posted On by &filed under High Court, Kerala High Court.


Kerala High Court
Muhammed Salim vs State Of Kerala on 20 July, 1900
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 6367 of 2007()


1. MUHAMMED SALIM,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.SANJAY

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :20/07/1900

 O R D E R
                          R. BASANT, J.
            -------------------------------------------------
                     B.A. No. 6367 OF 2007
            -------------------------------------------------
         Dated this the 23rd day of October, 2007

                               ORDER

The petitioner apprehends arrest in a crime initially

registered at the Santhanpara Police Station which was later

enquired into by the Vigilance Department and the subsequent

investigation is being conducted by the Crime Branch CID who

re-registered the same as Crime No.139/CR/KTM/07. The

petitioner was working as Village Officer of Chinnakkanal. The

petitioner apprehends that she may be unnecessarily brought

into the array of accused and vexed by undeserved arrest and

detention.

2. Notice was given to the learned Public Prosecutor.

The learned Director General of Prosecutions appears and

submits that at the moment the petitioner is not arrayed as an

accused and there is no intention whatsoever to arrest the

B.A. No. 6367 OF 2007 -: 2 :-

petitioner. If at any later stage the Investigator feels that the

arrest of the petitioner is necessary, necessary notice shall be

given to the petitioner sufficiently in advance. In these

circumstances, this petition may now be dismissed, submits the

learned D.G.P.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner accepts the same;

but requests that the said undertaking may be recorded and it

may be made obligatory that sufficient prior notice must be

given to the petitioner if there is any such intended arrest later

so that the petitioner can again approach this Court in due time.

The submission of the learned D.G.P. is taken note of and

recorded. The same is accepted. The apprehension of the

petitioner is, in these circumstances, found to be without any

merit.

4. This bail application is, in these circumstances,

dismissed.

Sd/-

                                           (R. BASANT, JUDGE)


Nan/



           //true copy//          P.S. to Judge


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

107 queries in 0.207 seconds.