Mukeshchandra vs State on 21 March, 2011

0
66
Gujarat High Court
Mukeshchandra vs State on 21 March, 2011
Author: Anant S. Dave,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/3548/2011	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 3548 of 2011
 

 
 
=============================================
 

MUKESHCHANDRA
@ MUKESH DADHI PRABHUDAS JHAVERI - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT - Respondent(s)
 

============================================= 
Appearance
: 
MR. HARDIK J JANI for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
MR AJ DESAI ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for
Respondent(s) : 1, 
=============================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 21/03/2011 

 

ORAL
ORDER

Rule.

Learned APP, waives service of rule on behalf of respondent-State.

Learned
advocate for the applicant submits that considering the nature of
offence, role attributed and punishment prescribed, the applicant may
be enlarged on bail.

Considering
the above prima facie aspects of the matter, I find this is a fit
case for granting bail. Under the circumstances, the applicant is
ordered to be released on bail in connection with C.R. No.III-120 of
2011 with Umra Police Station, Surat, on his furnishing bond of Rs.
5000/-(Rupees Five Thousand) with one surety of like amount to the
satisfaction of the lower Court and subject to following conditions :

not
take undue advantage of his liberty or abuse his liberty;

not
act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

maintain
law and order;

mark
his presence before the concerned Police Station on every 1st
and 15th day of English Calendar month between 11:00 am
to 2:00 pm:

not
leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Sessions
Judge concerned;

will
not enter the city and district limits of Surat, Valsad, Navsari,
Bharuch, Tapi and Dang for a period of three months except for
marking presence and attending trial;

furnish
the address of his residence at the time of execution of the bond
and shall not change the residence without prior permission of this
Court;

surrender
his passport, if any, to the Lower Court immediately.

If
breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions
Judge concerned will be free to take appropriate action in the
matter.

Bail
before the Lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case.

Rule
is made absolute. Application is disposed of accordingly.

Direct
service is permitted.

[ANANT
S. DAVE, J .]

//smita//

   

Top

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *