Muneer Khan vs The State Of Karnataka on 29 May, 2008

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT
BANGALORE

mvrnn THIS THE 29"' ms: or  %
BEFORE 'A %  "  

THE H()N'BLE MR. JUSTICEA»HULl34VALjfi;V(§;RA:MI§SH  
CRIMINAL PETITI( 12N r;g3g774%Q_§%_z0asLA%'%L% 

BETWEEN:

l.M1meerKhan, 

S/0 Rashwd  5  
Aged about 30 yc=a"1's.; ' A "   f

Aseai abcutk%2fi%yeari$- %%   f  L %

7,S!o_ Rashészd '  __ * -
Aged abm;t'?;§~  .4 

~  Sio not  ,

ggfaeut S5 yeara

  
A V  W./'0-Rasheed Khan,
-- "about 45 ycars.

 * s  residing at
v  Ejylanarasapum village,

WW



Nandagudi Hobli, Hoskcte Taluk,
Bangaiore Rural District,  ,  --  2 V
Bangalore.   

(By Sri-Budrunnisa, Adv.)   

A_ND:

The State ofKarnataka,      
Represented by State Pablic'PtoseVc tor,"  'H V}

City Civilcouncemgplex,»-"" --.   

Bangalore, Represent£:d_by  "  

Nandngudi Police swam.     [RESPONDENT

(By A

miskcfiminakT%%%rmm gamed under Section 433 of
Cr–.P~.C_. ‘eniargev the pefitioners on bail in
C_r.No._4 i’i€_38_a bf P.S., Hoskote Taluk, which
régistsred f6r’V”th6T»oufi%_znc¢ P/U/S.498A r/w Section 34 of IPC
and andm Sactiota 3&4 bfthe D.P.Act

. _ V.1fhisAACriminal Petiiien coming on for orders this day, the
‘ n , _V C_§)u.tjt the following:-

Q_.B.D..E_B

Patitioners have sought for grant of anticipatory bail in

connaction with Czime Ne.4I/08 of Nandagudi police, Haskote

ARK