IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.44634 of 2010
MUNESHWAR PRASAD @ MUNNI PRASAD
S/O LATE KARU MAHTO
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
3. 16.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
the state.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted
for the offence under Sections 272, 273, 419, 420,
467, 468 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47 (a)
of the Excise Act.
Supplementary affidavit filed today be kept
on record.
It has been submitted that the petitioner is in
custody since 12.9.2010 and is first offender.
Considering the same, let the petitioner
above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail
bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties
of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed
by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa, Nalanda in
connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 210/2010,
subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will
be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an
2
affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with
the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish
information to the Court about any change in address
of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly
state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other
case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail, (iii)
That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they
will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is
implicated in any other case of similar nature after his
release in the present case and thereafter the court
below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for
cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the
petitioner will be well represented on each date if he
fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be
liable to be cancelled.
Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)