Muneshwar Yadav vs State Of Bihar on 8 March, 2011

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Cr.Misc. No.37968 of 2010
                                  NUNESHWAR YADAV
                                           Versus
                                    STATE OF BIHAR
                                            -----

03. 08.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state.

Some incident took place is the admitted fact. According

to the prosecution, ransom was demanded and on its non-fulfillment,

glass of J.C.B. machine was broken and informant was parted with

cash and his mobile is supported by witnesses. Defence is about

petitioner being ‘Sarpanch’ of the village and only compensation

was demanded by villagers whose crops were damaged. On place of

occurrence, pieces of glass are recovered. Thus, I find it not a fit

case for anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, prayer of petitioner for anticipatory bail

stands rejected.

Vikash                                             (Mandhata Singh, J.)