IN THE HIGH COURT 0;: KARNATAKA, BANGALQRE.' i % DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 20:33 (i: if . BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I %
WRIT PE’I’I’1’iON NQd.23S1 S2005 (Sc;
BETWEEN
1
MUNIANJA1\U’xPPA S
S/0 LATE DO§DAMUN_IYAPjPA'”
AGED ABOUT A _
R/ATSOLUR «S
KUNDANA.}1OB7L’I,
DEVANAHALLE.VTQ.”;-. ‘-….__ S .
BANGALORE D1ST.S,.__
NA,NJA;E5F’A:VS/.6 1g\’r’S”kcH11<KAMUN1YAPPA
– ._”A{}EB ABOUTV48 YRS,
‘R151′ SQLUR VILLAGE
” K§J’N13’J’-WA HQBLI,
_ “5’_DE’+..fANP.Ef§.A.iLLI J’I’Q.,
S V BANGALGRE) DIS’1′.,
RAJAE5-A @ MUNIRAJU S/O LT
S , CHEKKAMUNIYAPPA
, “AGED ABOUT 38 YRS,
‘R/AT SOLUR VILLAGE
KUNDANA HOBLI,
DEVANAHALLI J’I’Q.,
BANGALORE DIST.
(By M/S: RAJ 81. ASSOCIATES, ADVS.– ABSENT)
M
Y’E’I’I’I’IONERS.
4
ORDER DTD. 7/:1/2000 PASSED BY THE R2 VIQE
ANX. Y.
THIS PETITION, COMXNG ON FOR PRELI§viI–N.r’5L._R ;§?j’ %
HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY THE COU!§’1’MADE 1
THE FOLLOWING: _. .
o,.–R D ‘E_;-_’£§_VV:”
Though caned tuzic-§on¢&e§ and
again in the :’§O»._ifé::{i1+c@ntation for the
petitioner, dismissed for
non-p1’0:s_ec11tioi1;–” , _v ” ‘ a ” 2
Sd/-3
Judge