CM No.2934-35-C of 2009 &
RSA No.1003 of 2009 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CM No.2934-35-C of 2009 &
RSA No.1003 of 2009
Decided on : 14.10.2009
Municipal Committee, Mandi Kalanwali ... Appellant
versus
Sheela Devi & others ...Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI
Present : Mr. S.S.Chauhan, Advocate
for the appellant.
****
1.Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see
the judgment?
2.To be referred to the reporters or not?
3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL)
CM No.2934-C of 2009
For the reasons mentioned in the application, delay of
38 days in refiling the appeal is condoned.
CM stands disposed of.
CM No.2935-C of 2009
For the reasons mentioned in the application, delay of
75 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
CM stands disposed of.
RSA No.1003 of 2009
This appeal has been filed against the concurrent
judgments of the Courts below decreeing the suit of the
respondent-plaintiff claiming retiral benefits and balance amount
CM No.2934-35-C of 2009 &
RSA No.1003 of 2009 -2-
of gratuity with interest of her deceased husband. The following
questions have been proposed:
i) Whether the ld. Civil Judge (Sr. Div.) rightly decreed
the suit in the absence of evidence?
ii)Whether the suit is time barred?
It would be seen that both the questions are pure
questions of fact. Learned counsel has not been able to persuade
me that the findings recorded on these issues are either based on
no evidence or are based on such misreading of evidence so as to
render them perverse.
Consequently this appeal is dismissed.
October 14, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE