Muniyappa vs Elagappa on 30 July, 2008

...-. . ,A.V_.A..¢:.A..., .. ...-...mmm.-a. rnura Luulu ur KARNATAKA I-HGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA H195 1

11%' THE IflGI-I COURT GP' KARNATAKA AT 

mmm 'was THE saw my 01? JULY, ' 

BEFORE

Tm H{)1.'~I"ELE am.  , 
wmrmmog flg,§fl.?,' ; QF"'2_f){¥8   k%

 E

1.

ammvayvn,
SJOBEERAPPA, <
AGED asmrr 5.15 H V. .

2.. am’.

‘%F}£13$0%I;£.AI?I*”fii;””–._ %
AGED mm}?

3%   
Sft}    _
AGED aa$I.:%r>@a  _ " "

4.  

” aw} 0 V5¥3NW1+I-==’lP?fl. . .. _____ .. e
YEARS,

Enimmas-L3 mmeg,

: rr:A%wHmB_2,g.’
Lmwa ramx,
~ & .j’j – .___X£)I.A.R nmzaax. …1=m’m0HEm

‘ E; SHE}?!-{ARI & P Pvumr Ifi}’11AR,Al{)VDCATE)

3;’ 42} BADL.AP?!’L,
MAT EDAQEIABELE,

Ly’ ax

– up-avioni-

…. uu-uu1r\IrlI\l”\ ruun \..’lAJ!’«J,_’l!l ur IKHKNAIAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAXA HIGH C

Raw HQBLX,
HALEIR TAIJIK, . H u ”

Kama nmmw. EES_PC2Hi§E§F

fiifiii

“§’h:fi Writ mm” ‘ n is am 1

nf that Camfimfion {sf India, quaah
pamfi by rm Princiml Jucigm. Alfiivisiofi, at

max ia inmmumzy app1ic£L!f!:m.'”§c3.¢€5 0.3.’

Ho.a:?;m:%3 flaw.-d 18.fi.2DD7V”fi1éd. as A m the
s=:’rit.pts1:it§s:~n and “thoaa “applicsittiom, cm.

Tfifi Pefiinn heaflq 111%
day, the Efiaursi
H %%;%Q§%§Q V
pameaafi Judge, Jumor Bfiviainn, at

% A Ma1m,_;%¢aHnH%3:.A. VN’:’:;:.?a_V_.}f:.”:«V’an;1::’-1 *3′ ha. 0.3. Ha.a?{2o93.

. laarrmd wumd fur the petitionmw. The
by the m tn re-open the
g%:%’::m pzamtm anti LA. No.7 was filed to permit

to mfiB£~ the pla.1’nti%. The Trial

afar mm1derung’ ‘ the 1.4%., was plmsed tn mjact both

the has. ‘fiermva me yreaent gefitinn.

<%3'!c-