Murali @ Murali Yesudasan vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 17 May, 2010

0
94
Kerala High Court
Murali @ Murali Yesudasan vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 17 May, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 2536 of 2010()


1. MURALI @ MURALI YESUDASAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.RAJENDRAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA

 Dated :17/05/2010

 O R D E R
                              K. HEMA, J.
              ---------------------------------------------------
                      B.A. No. 2536 of 2010
              ---------------------------------------------------
               Dated this 17th day of May, 2010.

                                   ORDER

Petition for bail.

2. The alleged offence is under Section 302

IPC. The prosecution case, as narrated in Annexure-A1

order, is as follows:

“The prosecution case is that on
6.3.2010 at about 1 p.m. the deceased
Babu and his friend Josekuttam @ Renjith
came to the house of the accused in a
drunken state. The accused who was
sleeping on the cot was asked to lie on the
floor and beaten by deceased Babu and his
friend Renjith with their hands. The
accused who slowly try to roll the mat on
the floor to lie down was called obscene
words and slapped on the face by the
deceased. The accused who again tried to
spread the mat was kicked on his face and
pushed out side the house, as a result of
which two teeth of the accused was
dislocated which caused bleeding from his
mouth. The accused went to the house of
Josekuttan to drink water. Again the
deceased and Renjith came there to attack
the accused. The accused ran to his house
for safety and took a piece of wood and had
beaten the deceased on his head with the
deceased was returning to his house.”

B.A.No.2536/10 2

2. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that a

reading of the facts narrated by learned Magistrate

themselves will show that petitioner is not guilty of the offence

under Section 302 IPC, but deceased and another were

aggressors and that petitioner was acting in self-defence.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that petitioner

was arrested on 25.3.2010 and he is in custody for the past 55

days.

4. On hearing both sides, I am satisfied that petitioner

can be granted bail and the following order is passed:

Petitioner is granted bail on his executing

bond for Rs.25,000/- with two solvent sureties

each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the

Magistrate Court concerned on the following

conditions:

(i) Petitioner shall report before the

Investigating Officer on 1st Monday of

every month until the charge-sheet is

laid.

B.A.No.2536/10 3

(ii) Petitioner shall not commit any

offence while on bail.

(iii) If the petitioner is involved in any other

offence while on bail, his bail is liable

to be cancelled.

Petition is allowed.

Sd/-

K.HEMA, JUDGE.

krs.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *