High Court Karnataka High Court

Muralidhar Kishandas Ahuja vs Paramanand & Sons on 11 August, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Muralidhar Kishandas Ahuja vs Paramanand & Sons on 11 August, 2009
Author: Anand Byrareddy
IN THE HIGH Comm' ()1? KARNATAKA A'§_E;%;§§;§. V  « x 

DATED T1113 T1113 1 1*" DAYFQF :A¥'JE}'i;*S'T.'2@{)9' ;  7

55333-5; V %    
THE HOWBLE MR. _3USTI{§.é}?x}5Qz%1§ZD "B&*RA1?,Em)Y
HOUSE RENT Rsvisiem?13*;*1'f:{32«:'k}~:a3.1o7 OF 2009

BETWEEN:    

Since d;3ceas'ed.i2y 4' _ Z

his Legal r<:p1'esciiié£ii_*kt:sb: '   '  .. '

3,) Shri. Kamar  " 
Aged aBc1,_'1iL§% jkeaars. " . 

b)  Rxzjcsh  ____ 

 V%    é VAgéd»«.é=;bouI _3é years  PETITIONER

 'VM"fi":;':.x:'léii2uvax2 & Kaiiash,

Simpping Afcadée, P202: N04,
NeW44No,,.3§,- 5"' Main Read,

 .4  _.Gandhi~nagar_,
 Bafigalofe M E60 009

  'SBfi.Y.K. Narayana Shanna, Ad wcaiej

V A. 154153. Przmranand And Suns,

A Registéred Firm of Partners,

5



la)

Gld N053, New Nu.84f35,
Bajaj Cempicx, 5"' Main Road,
Gandhinagary . '
Bangalore ---- 560 009
Represcniad by:

Power cf Attomey Halder,    V . _ '    
Shfi. Nawin B. Bajaj   R}fiS?C}"i"DE1f5T

(By Shri. Srinivas, Advucazg)

This Hgézgst: §l'£:r_;i Rcviiglibn  under Se-<1-{inn
46(1) of thei'Ka;i:af:£k& I{e:1ft,L.As.tV" the order and decree
«dated 13._|:)3.2§_Q9'fi1~2$SEL§_i1i HRC-__Nu.E%0;'2{)i}6, on {he file: of {he
XI Additiflnal,   s:sf "Small Clauses, Bangalore,
aiiuwing {hrs 'ptsiiiiazzu {iEt~;d'=:.1_Ii<$e1" Suction 27(_2)(b), (d)==1-and (I) :3?
KR. Act and diSmij$Sing"?'~~Vigl1$' petition filed under Section
2'?(2)(q) of'K_,R.,VAéi, 7 " "

 Huufié' «iigrnfi. Revision Pciiiiun coming un fur

   the Court made the foilmaringz -

ORDER

The. ;2$ii*ii¢:s who are present bcfurt: the Cuuri have

._e:t:£.;rzjt:(i into a compromise and sueis: to fiie: 2:1 pciiiion tinder

–‘ Rule: 3 of the Code uf Cévii Pwcedurc’ 1983 la; the

” ” .’ §3lIowing effect:

1, “Petitic}ne:2* wants tvm years tithe to vacate the schedule pfemisses

and he wiii not ciispute the finding given by me iriai Court

23

peiitio:2r::i* fuxfltnez’ e”:01ifi1’111$ that orders uxzcief

27(2) of KR. Act by the Court s:,vf”Sn1ali Causes,

2. The raspéaderxt has no objectéoza t(:g~ig’i*a11t.ti;r{¢ ‘4péfiti.e§:1éi’-VA
previeied the petitiamer flies 2211 agfiicizzvit i:§iaiAi.£:§éL”
tenazzt wiii pay the rent direct¥3eh5§3f «if L.

the petitiener and obtain :eeeip¢V£§mhe aef§;~e 55 mm
11101113: at Rs.’}’,4{)6,z’- p-.131. fr’Q1n” 1°egfiiariy.Avvi;:1a1ead of
as-,225x., an the éaté i:af; ds:Iive1’§.f’ ::3f””*é§;”:§.i1t,,possession of the
whedufe premigés. If f}1§’;V’1fci;ji1’€..Vf3;.;I;__’ai%1§7 V€:£§iV3,°9.§3s:iitiVt3 111031333 is

not paid, tI1:§.v:*csp= (_mdei1t c_:;H3..~;t3Xé%:iiié:_”€ll;_§___§§éC1’6e i1*1&”‘pec:tive of

the tiii1éTg1’a;§:ed li§;’éit2:’ ‘ ~ .

3. The giefiitiotger’ that the gretitiexxer md ffis sub-
tegiagat shéii! also vfi-1e£’–.a.xi’*~:¢’i1V11de3m;€,:”.g aflidavit atating that they

‘_ gigéiivgx’ ggfawssima of the scheduie gzaremises as per the
‘A ‘ csznznpromise petitien. The HI Eg afiidavit shall

V’ .beV £3? iiiis campmznise petition.”

is placed on rcszurd.

The: pctiiiuncr has 3159 flied an affidavit underiaking

…f,m}c-nmpiy with the cundiiiuns imposed under ihe: cumprumisse

” ‘ ” pcliiion, which is alga placed 9:: resort}.

5

3. The pmperiy which is in pusscssiun vi’-7 :i

has ai:-2:.) {Had an affidavit in this r¢ga;’§”diV’}’h<: samc; piac<:d'1

on mmrd.


The peliiiun   "pf Eh  of the
compromise: petition.       «.
    ;V Judge

3.}