High Court Karnataka High Court

Mushtaq Ahmed vs Aayesha Sulthana @ Nazia Tabursum on 17 August, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Mushtaq Ahmed vs Aayesha Sulthana @ Nazia Tabursum on 17 August, 2009
Author: Subhash B.Adi


,…. Olflvfiot ,..,..wH vwW’4VMl’h mu-wswlwmfl -nu-«»».mv-Wm» woww aw-mmmmw–mmwmwwm wsuswms wmwwmy ‘1w’f¥’ €>”a.<5~"t’¢;’:?¥*’®=t&»:Wr:&’MW §””M%’ar&”‘fi ifle.-k

£93

.I.j.¢3 ‘V

hawk

2% ?%§ §§$E’C@§§? 3? §E§§%?%Kfi, Efifififififififi ;

gavgg ?u:§ $32 i?TE 3%? $3 Rfifififi? E§Q9~ w

3i”€»§’i”;%Z*{-E

$33 ¥$§’EL§ ma, 3$$?:$$ 3§g§&3%–§”a§:a

32

32%,? £0 32%: as 3¢$;.3

‘V $1

§£?%§E§

%§§HTE§ fififififi

fiffi 5 % ?&?HR§, A.

aggfi fifiéfi? 32 Ygggg _ ~,~,*.
EEEQE Sfiéfiig §§RR?%§§TgH§$.323§3Em
§?§ EERSE, gay ?@§§*¥§;HA§xAg’v’
EEEQRLQRE A= “”=V” ” ‘ I

fififi :

fifi? gxyggfia’
§fi§%.§$”E~§’?E’§,2;§
Q§RERZ$,E£$

f?%.fii§.?§EE»ifisE%.?§3g§.? ,7 ?~”EY§€’sR§.. __ A.

§§?.$’§ v s§&$ &§&§§:

32%§’:_;§§$3?;’5?g.mA:%
§%Efi£§?&?§§ffi§§§%§

33$?’ S§fifiE%§&»§§&§R:
2_325§ § g§¥§£?, §?§ fiazg

‘”4Eg§:%§§?A§A, %Y$Q%$

“‘1’*m

§Efl%fi§S:Qfi§§RE
In 32%; C Lfi¥$§T, §TB1%AE§
§x§?a?&, §?s§a§

¥§E

5&1?

.7

.;

‘~?¥z ?fi@E$£ : 3§§$?$R
§?’€}f9f§EE§ E *§..;,,”iiZ°E S’?fi5E’E$§§
=y£Z&R%§A§§, fi?§%R£

3,3 R§§§§§§E%?$