IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 02?"? DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2010
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE H.BILLAPPA;'_ "' 5 A'
M.F'.A.No.2359 OF 2009 {QPC1 «
BETWEEN: A 4' " V'
N.A.Sheshadri,
S /0.AnanthaI1arayana. N.
Aged about 50 years,
R/at N0.G--3, Ground Floor, .
Pooja Residency, ' ._
Site No.1 8: 2, Chikkalasandrs ' A
Village, Uttarahalli Hobli, V
Benga1uru~61 . . ..Appe11ant
(By Sri.Srihafsha.;R;iV_4onf§1de.'E§tl$(..]_ ;
AND: A
1. T.G.La1gjsh1nmath~, ., _ '"
'S/Q.G.;_E_\iEamVt11,i Rao," ..... .. v
VAged.a.bou'i: 50 years,
PrQprie'{o_r>a_f e AV '
Sh§ee'- Kru'pa« E1 1tervpr1ses.
..No.1'9/1, 1StC1ross,5*hMain,
Nan] amba..__Agra'hara,
_ . '_ . ééchamaraj pet,
_ ' . Banga.1'0re#'i8.
'4 ' ' ~ « _ Overseas Bank,
..__No.9;45. 24th Main,
.. _4J.P-.'Nagar 2*" Phase,
Bangaloree 78.
Represented By its
Chief Manager. ...Respondents
(By Sri. H.V.Nagaraja Adv., for R2)
=l”lHk=i=**
This M.F.A. is filed {}/O 43 Rule 1(R} of ‘
the Order dated 17.03.2009 passed ‘..Qn il_te;ei:n 2′
O.S.No.l885/2008 on the file of Addiztioézal-.lC-ity’:C_iiri1_e
Judge, Bangalore dismissing the 1A.f1ledA’UJ/’O :1
2 of CPC for T.I.
This M.F.A. coming on day; the Court
delivered the following:– “‘2 _
The learned ..__thej appellant seeks time to
retire from the case. There justification to grant time.
‘vlearned”‘”t:ounse1 for the respondent No.2
broughtpto O.S.No. 1028/2010 was filed by one
_i1<il:2'i:e'spect of the same property and it was
on__Céi3.04.2010. The appellant has approached" the
Tribunal in ASA No.338 / 2009 and it has been
The Trial Court taking into consideration that the
L/
appellant has not made out prima facie case has rejected i_;_he
application.
3. There is no merit in this appeal’ if _
is liable to be dismissed.
Accordingly, it is dismissed. In
‘~ -as-..
s.,
GH/JS