High Court Kerala High Court

N.A.V.Abdulla vs K.T.Ravunni on 21 December, 2006

Kerala High Court
N.A.V.Abdulla vs K.T.Ravunni on 21 December, 2006
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl Rev Pet No. 532 of 2006()


1. N.A.V.ABDULLA, MANAGING PARTNER,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. K.T.RAVUNNI, MANAGING PARTNER,
                       ...       Respondent

2. STATE OF KERALA,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE

                For Respondent  :SRI.M.M.ANTO

The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA

 Dated :21/12/2006

 O R D E R
                                            K.HEMA, J.


                                  ----------------------------------

                                   CRL.R.P.NO.532 OF 2006

                                  ---------------------------------


                     Dated this the 21st day of December,   2006


                                             O R D E R

Revision Petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.506 of 1996 on the file

of the Judicial First Class Magistrate’s Court, Payyannur. First respondent is

the complainant therein. Revision petitioner was convicted and sentenced

to undergo simple imprisonment for six months and also directed to pay

compensation of Rs.5,000/- to the complainant in default of payment to

undergo simple imprisonment for two months under Section 138 of the

Negotiable Instruments Act. In appeal filed by him, the conviction and

sentence were confirmed by the Additional Sessions Court, Thalassery.

This revision arises from the said conviction and sentence.

2. At the time of hearing, both sides submitted that a petition as

Crl.M.Appl.No.13224 of 2006 is filed for compounding the offence. It is

also submitted by both sides that the matter is settled out of court

amicably between the parties. On hearing both sides and on going

through the averments in the petition, I am satisfied that this is a fit case

to grant permission to compound the offence.

In the result, revision petitioner is acquitted of offence under Section

138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, as offence is compounded. He is

set at liberty forthwith.

Crl.M.Appl.No.13224 OF 2006 and the revision petition are allowed.

K.HEMA, JUDGE

vgs.