M.F.A.N0.9122g2009
& Misc.CVI.23§51/2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALCil§E
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY or DECEMBER "
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE; "
M.F.A.No.91T22/2'oo§;_n
AND M1sc.cvL.2'3'551/2oo9~3 '
BETWEEN :
NADIRAM '- V 5
5/0 NARAYANASWAMAPPA-'* --
AGED ABOUT 52..w2.ARs '
R/A SRIRAMA NILAYA"' _. _
sAHAKARANAGAR_A
BENGALURU I\IQR'TE:{_TALTJ}{V ._ APPELLANT
{BY SR1 r€§§:jQjK;«v.ADV0cATE}
AND:
1 S N GU'PALAKRISHNA
_~ E3,/Q__NARAYANASWAMAPPA
- A "AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
» ~ R/A BYATFARAYANAPURA VELLAGE
' BENC-..ALURU_}NORTH TALUK
2 ' SMT ,.IALAJAKsHAMMA
'W/0' RAJAGQPALA REDDY
AGED. 69 YEARS
A' _ R/AVBYATARAYANAPURA VILLAGE
'BENGALURU NORTH TALUK
- 3""; SAMT SUMITHRAMIVIA
W/O ASHWATH
AGED 57 YEARS
R/A D.NO.837, 17"?" MAIN
M.F.A.NO.9122/2009
81 Misc. Cv1.2355 1 /2009
51"" BLOCK, BHASAYAM CIRCLE
RAJAJINAGAR
BENGALURU
SMT. BHLAGYAMMA
W/O c V NARAYANASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS ~
R/A BYATARAYANAPURA VILLAGE
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK
SMT KANTHAMMA
W/O PRABHAKAR
AGED 47 YEARS
SR1 KODANDARAM '
S/O PRABHAKAR ' '
AGED 31 YEARS H
RESPONDEN'T~NOs.5 6gARE A '
R/AQ.344,Vr:;G;1B'LOcK~ _ V
16'"? CR€3SS»,"'MALLESHWARAM--
EENGALuRU..55oor;3«--. «-
sR1fB V ,
s/G-__N vEN,KATARA_MAR_ --
AGED ABOUT 47 '~rEARs=-
Rm 924. N G BLOCK, A . E
16TH cRO_ss,. MALLE;SI~I\Z_VARAM
EENGALURD 660003
E w. _AC.ED,61YEARS
R,/A924, G BLOCK
Em .CI?.QSS',- MALLESHWARAM
. = A B--ENGALURU -- 560 003
SR: .sR1i§*1V1AsAMURTI--1Y
AGED ABOUT 7:2 YEARS
V' A RESIDING AT OLD N025
NEW NO.85
=FOURTH TEMPLE STREET
'E Q 6T" CROSS. MALLESHWARAM
f BENGALURU -- 560 003
10
11
M.F.A.No.9122g2009
8: MisC.CV1.23551/2009
SR1 N CHANNAKESHAVAMURTHY
AGED 87 YEARS
R/AT BYATARAYANAPURA VILLAGE
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK
N SIDDARAMAPPA -
SINCE DECEASED BY LRS I
21} SMT VENKATALAKSHMAMMA '
AGED 62 YEARS " D
W/O LATE SR1 siDDARA1vLA:>EA
b} SRI s JAYACHANDRA
AGED 39 YEARS, __
s/0 LATE SR1 SIDDARAJVLAEEA _ "
C] sm s NAPJRYANA;SWA1'-E23' *
AGED 3.7"3:EA'.Rs,==__ __ A A '
S/O LATE s';R1_._v_sI~DDAr?ANLAEEx ,
d} sMTvS..B'EJ§;DHé._' " _ _
.AGED_33 YEARS '
i_D/O LATE sRzs1D4DA§;A,MAPP
RESFON'DENT_ N'o.s'.A . 1 '1"(a_} "is: "1 1 {cl}
ARE R'/ATESRJ RAMA NILAYA
ASHWATHAPPAVFARM
S;HAN.KARA"NAGAR
._fE'ENGAL.URUm56G--e9"
g SINCE DEAD BY His LRS
E1') S'MT"\/ENKATALAKSHMAMMA
'AGED 50 YEARS,
A W/O LATE N JANARDHANA
" SR1 ASWATHNARAYANAKUMAR
AGED 42 YEARS
S/O LATE N JANARDHAN
M.F.A.No.9122g 2009
81 Misc . CV}. 2355 I /2009
C} SR1 UPENDRA KUMAR
AGED 39 YEARS
S/O LATE N JANARDHAN
d} SR1 NAVANEETIH
AGED 37 YEARS
S/O LATE N JANARDI-IAN -
RESPONDENT Nos. 12(3) to {d}
R/AT JODIDAR CIIATRA
BYATARAYANAPURA _V
BENGALURU NORTH
I3ENGALURU–560092. ‘RESPONDENTS
{BY SR1 SHANMUKHAPPA,’._AJ?VO–CA’I.’E ‘ ‘I « . T
M/s KESVY (3! CO., ADV’OCA’IE_s:*»E0R’C;ERA*IION OF’ ORDER DATED 03.12.2009
PASSED IR ‘OILS. 350.6319 / 1994 BY THE I ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND
SI:s;é,I_ONVs~”‘_;IUDIO’E [CCH.N0.2], BANGALORE, TILL THE
DIsI3Q’sAI.~OEfIRE ABOVE APPEAL.
MIFAI & MISC. CVL. APPLICATION COMING ON FOR
_ .AE}MI_SSIC)’N THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE
A T”‘Ir_OI.LOINING:
M.F.A.No.9l22[2009
& Misc.Cvl.23551/2009
.3 U D G M E N T
This appeal by defendant No.6 is directed agains_t
an interlocutory Order dated 03.12.2009. passed
trial Court namely the Court of the I Addl. 0′
Judge, Bangalore (CCH.No.2], ‘”13; ‘V
O.S.No.6319/1994.
2. I have heard the learneld’-,C’o.unseVl for
and perused the impugned orde1″”w-h_i’ch”h.as beeiiltinlforce
from the last one year.
3. the trial Court has allowed
the application file_dt:–:byt No.5 under Order 39
Rules -and the restraining the defendants
; from alienating.’ encumbering or creating any charge over
properties pending disposal of the suit.
The A suit for partition of the suit schedule
it”‘::T’.i”-propeprtieswZclairning that they are the joint family
properties of the plaintiffs and the defendants. On the
of the case, the discretion exercised by the trial
I/..
/
M.F.A.No.9122 g 2009
& Misc.CVl.23551/2009
Court in granting the order of injunction referred to
above cannot be said to be arbitrary or capricious.VtQ_’i~.._
warrant interference in appeal. No ground to –‘-‘
appeal. The appeal is accordingly diflsrnisse-d2″”‘
Counsel on both sides submit thatv’».ihe’fs1titdis’ now
down for evidence. Accordingl3rV.”l..deeni-
direct the trial Court to dispose
and in any event the date of
receipt/productionrofg a filn View of
dismissal of ~.tl_ie€iiriterloentorjffapplication in
also stands
dismissed. V’ V l
Appea: .di51n.issed;
V ‘/ ata