IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RP No. 1146 of 2006(F)
1. N.K.SATHYABHAMA,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. K.P.RAJARAM, S/O.GOVINDAN,
... Respondent
2. K.P.HARIRAM, S/O.GOVINDAN,
3. NIRMALA MUKUNDAN,
4. VIMALA, D/O.GOVINDAN,
5. N.K.JANARDHANAN, (DIED),
6. N.K.SADASIVAN, S/O.N.K.SANKARAN,
7. N.K.SAVITHRI, D/O.N.K.SANKARAN,
8. NL.K.CHANDRAVALLI, D/O.N.K.SANKARAN,
9. N.K.BABY SAROJAM,
10. P.S.RADHA, D/O.LATE N.K.JANARDHANAN,
11. JYOTHI LAKSHMI, DO. LATE N.K.JANARDHANAN
12. SUBBALAKSHMI, D/O.LATE N.K.JANARDHANAN,
13. NAGALAKSHMI, D/O.LATE N.K.JANARDHANAN,
14. NGARAJAN, S/O.LATE N.K.JANARDHANAN,
15. RAJALAKSHMI, D/O.LATE N.K.JANARDHANAN,
For Petitioner :SRI.M.P.KRISHNAN NAIR
For Respondent :SRI.N.L.KRISHNAMOORTHY
The Hon'ble MR. Justice J.B.KOSHY
Dated :17/01/2007
O R D E R
J.B. KOSHY, J.
—————————-
C.M.Appl.No.1032 of 2006 and
R.P. No.1146 of 2006 in C.R.P. No. 1123 of 1996
—————————-
Dated this the 17th day of January, 2007
Order
The C.M. Application was filed to condone the
delay of 56 days and the R.P. was filed to review the order
dated 5.4.2006 in C.R.P.No.1123 of 1996. The order in the
C.R.P. was passed after hearing the petitioner. A review
petition cannot be equated to a rehearing of the matter or
an appeal proceedings. I see no ground to review the order
passed in the C.R.P. Further, the reasons stated for
condoning the delay are also not satisfactory. Therefore,
both the delay condonation petition as well as the review
petition are dismissed.
J.B.KOSHY
JUDGE
vaa
J.B. KOSHY, J.
————————–
C.M.Appl.No.1032 of 2006
and
R.P. No.1146 of 2006 in
C.R.P. No. 1123 of 1996
————————–
Order
Dated:17th January, 2007