N Krishna Murthy vs Janardanaiah on 26 June, 2008

M.F.A.No.1i290f200'7

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANG"rALOR.E

DATED THIS THE 26"' DAY OF JUNE 2008 J V   »T

BEFORE

THE BOWBLE MR.J:1s'rIcE H:c..RA:m:a1Etjjj».,  

Miscellgmous First Agggal  g  _   ,j 'V  :  

BETWEEN:

N.KR§S}~iNA MURTHY
S10 LATE'; NALLAPPA

A635 ABOUT 62 YEARS

R/A'? N.K.M4STREE'I'

PAPAREBDY PALYA -- V g
NAGARBHAVI :1 STAGE   

BANGA1.oRE~5§ez-V2;-.   -.. "*~f'j;__'.L;m3PELLANT

(BY SRI f?C;'€'? 3§€i,Vhi.S.VARfiDfiRAJ£§N,
ADvo_.13:a5/2 " ~

 " '';?.L;sH%{;:~s§_1.Ra.:NGA R0'A--~a----« *
 01,13. «BANK COLONY
KQNMAKLJNTE;-. '

E3é¥I.\k1§f\_L€jvR§3v.¢ 550.Q 70 ..REsPor«rzm:~rr

' {BY srezé.-GV.KULKARN1 FOR SR1 RAJANIKANT KULKARNI,
" A3«3V'tZ3CA'i'ES.)

_ V "  * ..1 IN
TO.E§.N{Z%2868/2007 ON THE FELE OF THE VII ADDL. CITY CIVIL
 __'";}UL§GE, BANGALORE, (CCH.N().19}, DKSPOSING THE EA FILED
 »II,;'_G. 39 RULES 1 AND 2 OF CFC FOR T1.

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMiSSi{}N THIS DAY,

u 'THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:



M.F'.A.No.1I290f200'?'

JUDGMENT

Sri S.G.Ku}karni, ieamed counsel appeafitig’ A’

Sri Rajaxlikant K111i(arni for the respondent 3

that the impugleci order was granted A ;

of four months from 16.()8.i3€){)__7 azV”ic£, f1e.1V1<:<:: '

order is not in force new and ajnpeai
has become infi*uctu01i;*s;..':%" submission,
the appeal is dis;misVsed ififructuous.
Apmald;

…. 1«:.;:;: ” Sd/4