1
EN TEE HEGH COBRT or Kanmawaxk, 9ANGAgeéEf;
DATED THIS THE 2?" DAY 0? 5 Y.g§0§fi7§=°
BEFGRE.»w.
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L.MéRéyAN§"éwéM%=j"f
W.P. No.11383;:aQ9{:ReRE3}_' "
sawwgam: V '
N.M.Govindraj,
Sjo late Papaiah, .
Aged about 4?"years,"'V ._ _
Occ: Agricuitfi:e,:fi i' "* =7«,,
R/0 NagaqarepaLya;_ K' " '
Varthur Hobgi, '
Bangalore 35st fglaa} "" ... PETITIONER
' m1.- "The @eputy"€bmmissioner,
mAfl"_',
., Bangalgre District,
"VBangale:@.
. The figét. Cemmissioner,
" Bangalore Ncrth Sub Eivisien,
Bangalore. ... RE$PONޤNTS
j(By Sri.Satyanarayan Singh, HCGP}
?hi$ Writ Petition filed under fixticles
; u"E§6 and 227 of the Constitution of India,
praying to direct the R1 to send tha
appiicatien of the peti one: Dt. 29.1.1999 in
fihe Qffice of the R2 and further direct the R2
2
on receipt of the said appiicatien to dispose
off the same vide Anxwfi.
This petition coming {H} for preliminary
hearing" this day} the Court made figthe
feilewing:~ i~i
ORDER
Government Eleadex i$”mei:ected ite tékeg
notice on behalf of the ree§Qedenteiii*
2.
The learned*,”eounsel’,iferMW the
Petitioner submits, that *fihe” petifiieaer has
made an ae§EiQetiefi’as_per Annexure – ‘A’ ion
confermatien of eceupaficy rights. The learned
counsel fen the petitioner submits that the
“petiti5ner_ has eubmitted an application in
i*F0rm Mfigjk he the 1″ respondent for grant ef
land beafifig Sy. No.59 measuring 1 acre ?
‘7,iguntaei” of Babusabara Palya, Cheiakere,
‘Bangalore East Taiuk. He further submitted
“”uwthat the petitioner has pereeneily visited the
effice of the 1” respondent and made an
3
enquiry about the appiication given by him 33
per Rnnexure ~ ‘A’. He was iniormed_thatHhie_
application is considered. He has alsenfimdef
repreeentatien on 2G.O1.2Ofl9Ves,@er¢fifinexfife?7
‘B’ addressed to the_ Deputy_ Commieeioner,e
Bangalore, requesting him to ieeeefinégessary
direction to the/”Eahsiidafij to cefieifier and
pass appropriate order bdreuafitFtQ Annexure M
‘A’. ?heughgfeui_mcdths ere ever no Orders
have been paS§efi’byathew§eputy commissioner.
fience}: the’ pe:1t1¢n§:_ is before this court
seeking ttev.direct=fthe respondents to pass
~e appfgptiete erdepe.
T3{‘3nThe§ learned Government Pleader
sfibmitted that there is a delay of 18 years in
V”fiiling-” the representation, Annexure-‘B’.
tfience, en the ground Qf delay alene the
uwpetition is liable to be dismissed.
4
4. E have heard the arguments made by
both the parties.
5. in the light of the above, I feeL,it
is just and appropriate to issue diréctibfiWfib1*
15′ respondent — the Deputy ComMi$5icner;uV
Bangalore. to forward the ap§iiba€iéfi of tfié
petitioner in Formv?fl. tQVv’i§e%%gRSStu
Commissioner ~ EWd_xespQndent;u Onvregéipt of
fihe said appli¢afiiofiL3f2m” Kfespondent is
directed ti cénsidef and dispéée of the same
within 6 mcnths–Vfr§m ufihex date of receipt
strictly in acé©:danCe°wi€h law.
mi: §¢z;.2j_::;”_on is dispessed of accordingly.
Sd/~
Judge