Loading...

N.Narayanan Thampi vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 26 November, 2008

Kerala High Court
N.Narayanan Thampi vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 26 November, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 33296 of 2008(L)


1. N.NARAYANAN THAMPI, S/O.RAMA VARMA RAJA
                      ...  Petitioner
2. B.SUBHADRAMMA, W/O.T.S.RAVEENDRANATHAN
3. G.SIVANKUTTY, S/O.S.GOVINDAN, KUMARAPU-
4. M.N.VASUDEVAN PILLAI, S/O.NARAYANA
5. V.N.SANTHOSH KUMAR, S/O.K.K.NARAYANAN
6. M.SHAHUL HAMEED, S/O.MOHAMMED HANEEFA,
7. M.MANOHARAN, S/O.K.MADHAVAN NO.27, MANOJ
8. D.LEELAKUTTY, W/O.D.GABRIEL, TC.11/632,
9. K.N.RAJASEKHAR, S/O.K.N.KUNJUKRISHNA
10. K.M.SUKUMARAN, S/O.CHANDU, SANGAMAM,
11. K.P.RADHAKRISHNBA PANICKER
12. E.K.UGRASENAN, S/O.P.KESAVAN, NO.10,
13. V.KALIDASAN, S/O.R.VELAYUDHAN, AVANI,
14. M.RAGFHUNATHAN, S/O.K.V.MADHAVAN, RAKHI,
15. KSAILAJA KUMARY, D/O.M.KRISHNAN,
16. A.RAJENDRAN, S/O.ANANTHAKRISHNAN
17. A.SAINUDDIN, S/O.AHAMED PILLAI, RFAIJI
18. T.SUBASHINI, W/O.EATE B SASIDHARAN,
19. L.HELEENAL, W/O.H.ELIAS, RASHIMI NIVAS
20. T.BABY, W/O.LATE S.SOMAN, ANJALI
21. S.ABDUL KARIM, S/O.N.SAMALABHA
22. N.PARMESWARAN NAIR, S/O.P.N.NARAYANAN
23. G.MOHAN, S/O.M.GOPALA PILLAI, VISAKH,
24. K.SASIDHARAN, S/O.K.KOCHU KUNJU, 5/147,
25. S.ANDREW, S/O.SABARIMUTHU PILLAI,

                        Vs



1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD
                       ...       Respondent

2. CONTROLLING AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT'

3. APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENTS

                For Petitioner  :SMT.T.D.RAJALAKSHMI

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI

 Dated :26/11/2008

 O R D E R
                            V.GIRI,J.
                     -------------------------
                 W.P ( C) No.33296 of 2008
                     --------------------------
            Dated this the 26th November, 2008

                       J U D G M E N T

Petitioners were employees of the Board and had

retired on superannuation. They are aggrieved by the

non-disbursal of the entire amount due to them by way of

gratuity. They had approached the Controlling Authority

under the Payment of Gratuity and orders were passed

determining the amount due to them. But they have not

been paid the amount due to them by the Board so far

and hence the writ petition.

2. Learned standing counsel for the Board

submits that principal amount due to the petitioners

have been deposited before the Regional Joint Labour

Commissioner and undertakes to see that the amounts

due to them by way of interest are also paid within next

two months. Submission is recorded.

In the result, the writ petition is disposed of

directing the 2nd respondent to see that the balance

W.P ( C) No.33296 of 2008
2

amount due to the petitioners by way of interest in terms of

the orders passed in their behalf by the controlling

authority are either deposited before the controlling

authority or paid to the petitioners within two months from

the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Obviously,

the amount already deposited before the Regional Joint

Labour Commissioner shall be disbursed to the petitioners

by the said authority on production of this judgment.

(V.GIRI,JUDGE)
ma

W.P ( C) No.33296 of 2008
3

W.P ( C) No.33296 of 2008
4

(V.GIRI,JUDGE)
ma

W.P ( C) No.33296 of 2008
5

W.P ( C) No.33296 of 2008
6

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More Information