High Court Kerala High Court

N.P.Asma vs Special Tahsildar (La) For … on 3 January, 2011

Kerala High Court
N.P.Asma vs Special Tahsildar (La) For … on 3 January, 2011
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

LA.App..No. 273 of 2009()


1. N.P.ASMA, W/O.MAYAN, SHAMEER MANZIL,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. NELLIYATTU PUTHIYAPURAYIL SHEMENA,
3. NELLIYATTU PUTHIYAPURAYIL SHAHILA
4. NELLIYATTU PUTHIYAPURAYIL SHAHILA

                        Vs



1. SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA) FOR AIRPORT
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.CIBI THOMAS

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
The Hon'ble MR. Justice N.K.BALAKRISHNAN

 Dated :03/01/2011

 O R D E R
                     PIUS C. KURIAKOSE &
                    N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JJ.
                    ----------------------------------
                      L.A.A. No.273 of 2009
                      ------------------------------
            Dated this the 3rd day of January 2011


                          J U D G M E N T

Pius C. Kuriakose, J.

The claimants are in appeal. The property under

acquisition was in Keezhallur amsom and the purpose of

acquisition was the construction of Kannur Air Port Project. The

Land Acquisition Officer awarded land value at the rate of

Rs.682/- per cent. The Reference Court on evaluating the

evidence which consisted of oral evidence of AW1 and based on

the documentary evidence Ext.B1 would refix the land value at

the rate of Rs.1,500/- per cent for a total extent of 1 acre and 94

cents. In this appeal the claim is that the land value be refixed

at the rate of Rs.2,500/- per cent.

2. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant

and Smt.Latha T. Thankappan, the Senior Government Pleader

for the Government. Smt.Latha would fairly bring to our notice

the judgments in L.A.A.Nos.1634/2008 and 1696/2008 to which

L.A.A. No.273 of 2009

-: 2 :-

one among us [PCK(J)] was a party. It is seen in the judgments

that, for identical lands this Court refixed the land value at the

rate of Rs.3,000/- per cent. Even though there is justification to

grant value of land under acquisition at Rs.3,000/- per cent, as

the claim is limited to Rs.2,500/- per cent, the appeal will stand

allowed to the extent of refixing land value at Rs.2,500/- per

cent. It is accordingly refixed.

The appeal is allowed to the above extent. Parties are

directed to suffer their respective costs. It is needless to

mention that the appellants will be eligible for all statutory

benefits admissible to them under Sections 23(2), 23(IA) and

Section 28 of the L.A.Act also on the enhanced compensation.

PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,
JUDGE.

N.K.BALAKRISHNAN,
JUDGE.

Jvt