N P Ramaswamy Mudaliyar vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 July, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 2131' DAY OF JULY 2010 

BEFORE

THE HON'I-BLE MR. JUSTICE H NJN..AQAM'OI-L'§NDD;i\SIV V': "  

WRIT PETITION NO.379O6:"IQFf_2E}§O§3'{LRRT   7

BETWEEN:

SR1 N.P.RAMASWAMY Iv.IUDAI.,IY.AE_, 

S /0 LATE N.PACHHAPPA~ MEJDALIYAR,'
AGED: 86 YEARS. OCC:AGiPJL1U:'L'fUVRISTO,_
R/A BELAKAVAD_1VILLAC3{E..V  jv   _ 
MALAVALI TA_I_.UI{;- _MA1NDYAC:D_1STRIC"i',«..C 
REP. BY HIS %3PA;'SIiV0LDER"" * _ 
SINCE DEAD 'I~3Y'L-R_ '      V

SR1 ER.MSIIAN2i;mLUfMUDAI.IYAR.
S /0 SR1 1v_A1\/IASI2vAMYV%IvIuDAI,IYAR.

AGE:5'3 'YE_A'RS,' 0'C.CA:.AGI_:{ICU'LTURIST,

R /A BELAKAVADI ~VILI;A_c';I:';

MALAVALI=TALUF£_, I V'  

MAEIDYA DISTRICT. I ...PETITI0NER

Of  SI*€i,fIfO;R.._§3RA$ANNA. ADV.)

1;'.4"'TH~E.S'1"'ATE OF KARNATAKA
REP: BY ITS SECRETARY,

L " DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.
xM.S.BUILDING,

"T3ANGAI,0RE A 560001.

 2. THE LAND TRIBUNAL.

REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN.
MALAVALLI TALUK,

MANDYA DISTRICT.
J"

Ow,



3. THE TAHSILDAR,
(CHAIRMAN OF R~2)
MALAVALLI TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT.

4. SRLMALLAIAH

S / O LATE GANDAGI DUNDAIAH.

AGEIMAJOR,
OCC:COOLIE.

5. sMT.MANcHA1v1MA, 
w/0 LATE VENKATAGIREYAYYA,'  

AGEKVIAJOR,
OCC :COOLIE.

6. sR1.G1RIYAYYA.,.   '

s/0 LATE VENKATAGIRI_YAY?£{A,..:V"~:."_:.._2 T" ~ V'

AGE:i\/IAJOR, p  
OCC:COOLIE.

7. sR1.cHIKI{A.€fENi%;ATA1Aii1, p
s/o LATE VE'NKPi1'AGiif{IYAYYA.
AGE:MAJOR,« '    

OCC:COOLIE,._4 * _ 

 
 , 1) /O LATia:;vENKATAGiR1YAYYA,
"_Ac¢::i\aAaoR,a.ap  _

0cc;.coQiLiiE. A

' " Ri:sP--QN13i«:Nit-S NO.4 TO 8 ARE ALL
 p R/AT BELAKAVADI VILLAGE.
* A  - -MAALAVALL"I TALUK,
 _ NITANDYA DISTRICT.

This Writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227
of the Constitution of India praying to direci the R2 land
tribunal to consider the application dated 27.12.1997 filed
by the petitioner for appointment of receiver in respect of

J"

. . .RESPONDENTS

____”‘{BY; sR1.2:AHEER AHMED, GA FOR R1–3.
. ‘SRI.B.M.ARUN FOR R4-8 ADV.)

the petitioner then the tribunal shail consider the

same in accordance with iaw.

observations, the writ petition is hereby

Ii’

3:5,;

°mo>V~"$ '

brn    _  '

With the at;t§§;f’e._V

dispeiseti .;.V _

wggaga ‘~