IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 383 of 2009(U)
1. N.P.SANTHOSH KUMAR
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE SALES TAX OFFICER
... Respondent
For Petitioner :SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH
Dated :05/01/2009
O R D E R
K. M. JOSEPH, J.
--------------------------------------
W.P.C. NO. 383 OF 2009 U
--------------------------------------
Dated this the 5th January, 2009
JUDGMENT
Aggrieved by Ext.P1, petitioner preferred Appeal and the
Appeal was disposed of by Ext.P2, modifying the assessment
order. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner has time till 10.2.2009 to prefer Second Appeal. It is
also pointed out that Ext.P1 assessment has been modified and
yet, recovery steps are afoot on the basis of the original
assessment.
2. I heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
and also the learned Government Pleader. The Writ Petition is
disposed of directing that recovery proceedings against the
petitioner pursuant to Ext.P1 will be kept in abeyance for a
period of one month from today.
Sd/=
K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE
kbk.
// True Copy //
PS to Judge