IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA. BAN
DATED THIS THE 261*! DAY OF OCTOBER
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM' & "
MISC.W.N0. 9316:"1OE{%2O'oé'*E
xzsz,
w.1>. NO. 26772 OE~.2oo9 gsaojs)
BETWEEN
N RAJU @ A N CHIKKARA;J U=_ V
S/O. LATE NINGEGOWDA' ' -
AGE 50
R/O. NO. 6-5';
THIA/1MA1A1§VRa'gA._D, SE{1VArJAGAR
BANGALORE»¢1o--;;;,_ '«....__5...PETITIONER
(BY SR1, BABA 7
AND: V . V . '
TH3a:§O'E:»1TRAL A._RECANI}'T AND
. _ COvCOA"EMARKET'IN'G"AND PROCESSING
A c:O.OP_. LTD.{CAMPCO)
'M1-ss1ON"sTREE'T, MANGALORE
{BY s1;~'2;'1'.--* "M R C RAVI. ADV)
RI3__P.BY _1:'s'iM'ANAG1NO DIRECTOR
Mr."-P MAIJI*fUSUDI~IAi\IA RAO. RESPONDENT
IMPLEADING / PROPOSED RESPONDENT NO.2
CENTRAL REGISTRAR AND
REGISTRAR OF C0.0PERATIVE SOCIETIES
IN KARNATAKA NO.1
ALI ASKAR ROAD
BANGALORE — 560 G522.
Tms MISC.W. FILED UNDERAORDERHiSRtj;L?e”‘1.o»pVo’E 1″
CIVIL PROCEDURE com: PRAYjING_f1’0
PROPOSED RESPONDENT AS R2 IN’eWLPO.:2:67O7’?. p ~
THIS MISC.W. COM{I¥i.G”~.ON FOR ‘1*H1sf”
DAY THE COURT MADE THE”eF_oLLoWIN(;e
iokbfiklflp
This app1icationH_V_is_ petitioner to
implead the étiéffientral ipfiegistfaf Registrar of
Cooperative hpaity respondent No.2. In the
affidavit ac.compVanSyin’g application except for stating
p_ thatitlie’propostiflfliffipondent is a necessary and proper
‘pa1’ty, reasons are not forthcoming.
” . H T1ie’.’-a’pp’iication is, accordingly rejected.
sd/-.
Judge” ‘
aim