High Court Kerala High Court

Nabeesa vs The C.I. Of Police on 17 August, 2006

Kerala High Court
Nabeesa vs The C.I. Of Police on 17 August, 2006
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 5028 of 2006()


1. NABEESA, W/O.HABEEB,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE C.I. OF POLICE,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice J.M.JAMES

 Dated :17/08/2006

 O R D E R
                            J.M.JAMES, J.

                              --------------

                           B.A. 5028/2006

                            ------------------

    DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2006




                              O R D E R

The petitioner, the second accused, in crime

No.115/2006 of Pandikkad Police Station was

unsuccessful in getting bail from the Court of the Special

Judge (NDPS Act Cases), Vadakara, as the bail application

of the petitioner was dismissed, on the ground that the

investigation has not progressed and she may get bail on

the latter stage. Hence the petitioner is before this Court,

under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

2. The petitioner was arrested on 9.7.2006 and

remains in judicial custody from 10.7.2006. 40 kgs of

ganja was seized from the house of the petitioner. As the

petitioner is working as a home nurse in different houses,

she used to hand over the key to the adjacent house,

Eleven year old son of the petitioner alone was in the

house. The police received some information that the first

accused, who is habitually engaging himself in

B.A.5028/2006

2

transactions in ganja and other contraband items, had

kept forty kgs of ganja in the house of the petitioner.

The counsel submitted that the petitioner is unaware of

the storing of the ganja in her house, as she was away

from the house. When the police went to the house, the

first accused ran away and escaped. The petitioner had

been arrayed as accused, only because she is the owner

of the house.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that

the investigation has progressed much, but for getting

the report from the chemical analysis laboratory.

4. In the above facts situation, I grant bail and

release the petitioner from jail, subject to the following

condition:-

(a). The petitioner shall execute a bond

for Rs.25,000/-, with two solvent

sureties, each for the like sum, to the

satisfaction of the Special Judge (NDPS

Act Cases), Vadakara. At that time,

the learned Sessions Judge is authorised

to impose such conditions, which are

B.A.5028/2006

3

deemed necessary, so that the petitioner

would be available before the Court, for

the trial and disposal of the Sessions

Case.

The application is allowed as above.

J.M.JAMES

JUDGE

mrcs