High Court Karnataka High Court

Nagamma vs State Of Karnataka By … on 11 September, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Nagamma vs State Of Karnataka By … on 11 September, 2008
Author: K.Sreedhar Rao
Between:

1.

Goya}? Adv; 1

11¢: THE HIGH COURT OF’ KARNATAKA AT 3A.§$i_f§$§’;f€§’§?E

DATE13 was THE 11th DAY OF sE?rE:$:£1:BEEi%s 2§.g;«g}’ K

THE HONBLE ma. J1}STICE”K;”8REl§f;>I?§AR Rx; ” _

Cr1.A. of ”

Smt. Nagamma” $ ” 2
W/0 Ha1mmani;hapf;:a;._A ‘ ”
Aged &bU.131*_:i–56:;y€18.3.’$; :
}T€/04i%f533f1o’L%_i”V€3Ql0r1§;’,:. , = ‘

Ba$av&;§;gzttétf1a,’C1¥,zii1:1};gLfi mink,
V£)avamr3agr:3f¢VDistfict; .

r.Smi.. ‘ 5

/ E’! Sl1ij3″.8;?§?i1JI’t1:};§’»,.’
Age::_<_:1" abofit V36 }f€'3_§?1I'S

R/0 E3h0'.ri.'-Cdiofiy,

£Basavé.jpat:ana,ChaImagiri taiuk,

V. *A'Daiti3nageré"'District=.

…. .. Appe:§}.am.s

_ ' ;S'e:33:e af Eialnataka by
'"§3af.savapattana Felice;
Qavaflagefe: Digtrict.

…… ., Re:s;pc>nd.em:

{By Sri G.Bh:3.var:iSi:1gh, SPF. }

The site was not granted. The deceased was insisting A 1
to refund the money. A 2 went and abused thetdeceased

and threatened the deceased not to ask 91′

money. In that regard the deceased 3735-:

oath in the Mutt that she wcttld Vbayfizzerzt.

After the said. incident thet_1_eceased u L’

2. In both the ver§ions””i1;= the cotitenticn that the
deceased was put tc VA lfetntifiated in public.

I-§ence”ccm:i?i_tteE*1 ‘Vs! ‘?fie”ab0ve narrated facts, under
no stfetch. «can constitute an offence under

Sectéen 3{36_. =T’he’: ofder of conviction is perverse and

‘A Heiicetyyttiie appeal is allowed. The order of

VccIiVietiQr: ieVV’Set aside. ‘§’he accused are acquitted. The

V”‘bf~

b§*;11’€.iVt’ stand eancelied.
e sd/-

Iudge