High Court Karnataka High Court

Nagappa Dharmanna Donagi vs The Divisional Controller on 28 August, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Nagappa Dharmanna Donagi vs The Divisional Controller on 28 August, 2008
Author: K.Sreedhar Rao Gowda


BETWEEN: H

EN THE HIGH COURT C}? KARNATAKA CERCUYI’

XI’ GGLBARGA

mcrga THIS THE 28TH my GE .aUGI:J5

PRESENT u . _

THE; H{}N’BLE MR. JUs*:*:§;:–E; K. VS§’i¥;r”;4;’}:”3!7}_i”I2’%:;V’I§”%EA”§§15s{3…

THE HONBLE MR, .:£j_é*r1c’§%:: ékgfifiivasg GOWDA
M.F.A.”

SHE; NAGPx”£?§?A U.Hs,grv1a9:Np–. DGNAGI,
AGED} 30′ YEA;:§f:’3,% ‘<;rc:z;:::_ €:o0LzE:,

<1:/0. 1&3'; sH'2£§G§;;».

ADVOCATE KESAGERIA {_.3Ni,
BI,;APUR.* _

si_§§f’1*.:,.As1~1:~>a(A1\«Izx’/£,2=;’,’ ****

“W/Q,’ f~I.II~I4G ~;P?A. DONAGI,

A A_G’ED’:« ‘YEARS, ace; H.H. wow,

A ” ?3.NVD

._ C;Q.”‘H§’g.s~§ii’R0L,

zx»,11jvc:;c_m-:«: AKESA{}i3R§ om,
8’IgIAP’..UR’.v APPELLANT

– {BY Q1] 3. CHEFANA ASSOCIATES, ADVOCATES}

TEE SEVISIONAL CGNTRGLLER,
~MAHARASi~i’TRA STATE
ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION,
” SHOLAPUR.

fx’ES§’ONDENT

(BY RV. JAIP§K’AKAS§~I, ADV.)

TEES M.§’.A. IS FILED U/S 173(1) 0? :~§z3ffC>.R

VEHICLES AC1′, 1988, PRAYING T0 ALLOW THIS
MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARS DATED
PASSED BY THE II ADDL: CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN,}V’?-.N{)V_””T V’

MEMBER, l’ViAC’§’–ViI, BLIAPUR IN MVC} NO.62*%,f,g_{3{}2;’–.V:’ ._

This M.§’.A. coming 031 fbr _}_:14éari12g. .33:F?.z:ig.

SREEEDHAR RAG, J, deiivezed the f01It:§w*i;:i1_g:’¥
wmhfigflg V’

The appaiiants fiiefl petifigfi éfimfifinggfion on
accaunt of death of 3 meter vehigfké
acciéent. The dag:-:a$ed the time of
accident. ‘5 1’; tbs jurisdictional
limits sf, ‘ ‘

2. The N§,§§;C{I’Vfi, fcstmd that than: is no evidence

pr0d§1n_§:jeC1*to shaziwyhe rt:-sidencc of fiifliifii’ pefitionem or the

V. ajt B.i}apur to entertain the petition. Acceréingly,

flm: ifii-(f.iismiss:::d cm the groumi sf tcrxitoréai

. juxisa:eae:::. »

u Pctitioucrs have new fik-1d LA. No.1 by preducing

.’ evidence 32.6. Identity {lard issuad by the Election

Cémmjssion of India, Raficm Card to gamve that the

: ciaitnants am the zesicients of Inéi Taiuk, Bijapur Bisfiicty

é. £11 view of ;::roducticm of the evidence: 331$’, _

Tribmlal is set aside. The mat:éfV “is« .m%m,am¢j&

M.A.C.T., Bijapur aiong w:ith_I.A. §k:1.I ‘z;u1d ci§;:;1:fi:{:£n{s–<'iiw:' '–w.L

eonsixiezaticm and to disposé–vL.:b*f, theft '*–II_ia"ttr:;%7 in
accaréaficg with law.

.54/_*

ad/…

Judge