High Court Karnataka High Court

Nagarathnamma vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 October, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Nagarathnamma vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 October, 2009
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh


‘”vB%Rfi;§REe§§’

‘3EY figii A ¥’¥5#%¥:

IGH COURI’ OF KARNATAKA I-£36!-I OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNA’¥Ai(A HIGH C1

IE $3 $133 aavgw 33 KEREATAKE AT Eggéaigfig

namgn THIS was 2%” max 3? §?Q§£fi,;2§éé- ‘”_

ggyaag

THE HaN*BLE MR,Jvs$:cE’R§§$?Ani §faExE$E *~

caxmzxaz 93Tz?z§§x§a;49§2;2e§§””‘
£E%EE§ V x « V

sax. ungaaargnaxxa a
$13 J¥®THYE$3§Efia§§Af’ _,
AGEE ABGE? Eé YES i .’-.”L;

ajam Nfi§D§SUflIqV13Lé§E_»f.

H§SKBTE€?fiE3KV\. ga§*ELE says: 3%: 33 yaxasag IQ ;;
‘*~EEfZT§fiEE §& EREE Ifi Sfilfifi §%.1§1£2e$§

waarra $3

{$.€.EE§.§§4;’2§§§% Q? §Q};eE{Z§ §T§’I’IQE<3',
§%$'§§ §§E'€3§E~E$= $324 '§fE~& §ILE SE' TEE €§I'i?E§.; :2'£°%E

VP"

IGH CQURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH Cl

§JR.,E.%E%) , Hasxaza, Bfifiéfififififi 33%; §:2′:’§.’:6a:?:*–.T:%f3P’

mm aygmqcg Efiiffi -§§8{%.:, 332,3&4′:§§’*–«§§?__j:;::_

fi}$ SECTIGET 3 3 é Q? fii? §§GT.

353:3 FETITIGZBE cafizge-‘§2=’§–«.2¢.a _;::%::§_:zts’—-iT§:Vs ‘

EAY, trim mm}: mm TI-E §::x;.L:}a+ar::i.xI3*T:..

3 R’ 3. E E. ki

The petitiofieg féi “grant mi

antiaigatery hail ‘V’If;:}f3,’.v”1¢’;.f=i§§§a27i;$:V£;Z’;’ET.}?;.fi:!’;’;i ‘£4-Eiéfih Crimeé

rm.:.s1;’2aa:~s§;{AL1>:;£ :§a:ag$;ag«:;ja:*%V.% :%éi§.m far: the

azlegeéi _ ¢§;§4Z’u’f§éI1’¢i’31&-54 ‘i.}§§.%§;2’;§..£-3}’i%:,b3.Q xmdar Sactiana

Eu§§¢V »a2:s:§ Sectiszzs 3 3.11% 43

at §¢%§~3:.+fg 9;».-a, ::’i;f:e;:V.«:.’i;é.;£:a. =.;éfi’$’t.

“7§:-:éa;:f1e;:% ._th$ ‘”i€§arn$é Qazunagi far 21:29

:€:..s§é§.§ aw: =3: ;_’:-% &y::;::é.i Q 3 ,

‘ iiégiiegaé that getitimzex 3,15 fififiiifiéfi
2&3 tha mathfix-inwiaw af the daasaggé.
izzatigatizzg Eizaz’ 3&3 ta Eaaxasa azié
§V3.é’éa:;it tim fiezzaaggd in cazzzzéatimé with tag

dawxy séemand. 1:’: thig ragazé, being

WW…

fruatrateég tfie égaaasefi hag chmittafi

saiciéa.

4. Leaxned $euns$EV f§r2 tha. ;§atiéicfiéx

suhmittefi. that airsa§y{‘€at§gréim§i&%iMéfV théV

aeaaasafi hag ba§fi,grafié§£ §éi;. éfiaaéréingiy,
én paxity; this y$ti$§¢fiér_$ayj$;§w be granted

b&il.

5. : §éfW[ Qéfi§f§%g th§”” 2éa:nefi fiavarnment
?lea&%r«3§%mi%:#é %h&t the petitimnez is the

m&thar~i£~EaQ}a§aifist whaa, ihara ifi §$Q$t aat

QGW COURT OF l(ARNATAKfia MGR OF KARNAHRKA HIGH COURT OF KARNAYAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH C1

:&tszi§fi§ed; agfi £§xfih5r tha demsased éiefi

wifi§in 6méz§e&§’Qfi hex mazrifiggfi

~~f§§ a fix §a%§sal af tha aaziigx firdaz gaaaeé it
4 i5 é&é§ that thaza was Rfi avast amt attributgd
.ixaé§;§$% she fath§r»in~i& &m it ia fibsazvfifi
R*fi£&t mQt§a£–in-lam of thg fiéfiaafiéfi. wag

“ifitigatiag hex gag aha i$_t§e fiasbaaé $5 tha

W

rmmfi ¢…UU1(I’ U?’ Km%NA?Afi€A Hifii-E” OF KARNATAKA I-HG!-I COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURV OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH

fiaceagafi ta as3§ait figs inT &onm@3§£éaf fiith

dewry demanfi, therafeze, the fatha§§invi§§–%§$H_
grantad hail. Hawever;””t%e flc§§é afia}tfii3

§$ti€iQfi$§ ¢ann$t be ¢§n5i§er§§ Q5 gaxztgfir E;

£3 fax tha §atitian§£ tQ gérrgnfififififififi mavé

far rggulax h&ilg_
?. .&aca:&i§giygf§§§;pgfigfigénbgg éisgaaafi efi.

Sd/-

JUDGE