High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Nagendra Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 26 August, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Nagendra Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 26 August, 2011
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                       Criminal Miscellaneous No. 28104 of 2011
               1. Nagendra Singh S/O Heeralal Singh R/O Vill. Nawada
               Pasrasauni, P.S. Uchkagaon, Distt. Gopalganj.
                                           Versus
                                  1. The State Of Bihar
                                     --------------------

02. 26.08.2011 Supplementary-affidavit filed today be kept on

record.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for

the offences under Sections 419, 420 and 304 of the

Indian Penal Code.

Considering that the petitioner is in custody

since 04.08.2011 and the allegation against him remained

uncorroborated, let the petitioner, above named be

released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-

(Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each

or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the

satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in

connection with Uchkagaon P.S. Case No. 124 of 2011

subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the

bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will

give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related

with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to

inform the Court if there is any change in the address of

the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on
2

affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the

petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature

after his release in the present case and thereafter the

court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for

cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the

petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the

police papers on the given date and be present on date

fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates

and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable

to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the

petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he

fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be

liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-