IN THE HIGH mum or KARNATAKf:*~'C: %[ _
cmcuzr BENCH AT DHAfiWA. DW ;u«" % A
DATE!) was THE 20*" may oF+=%Eai2uA$2»'
BEFOI3'2'E' %
HON'BLE MRJUSTICE":§§OH}§M:.'S'HAVl$:?L'?ANA6OUDAR
warr QM-rags)
Between :
NAGESH """
s/0 APPAYYA SAN:-§EVAi&'!A . '
AGED A130:.1T':4 'KEAIQS-., "
000 s'I'U1:3E'm"* % '
SINCE MENORREP I3?' _ *.
H18 NATURAL GU.:\RDIA§--&I *
VFATHEKAPPAYYA " - V
SJO N.kGA}?§?A sawxgvxama
',AG'g::>4 ABOUT' <:;mrEAz2s
O.CCV.SE~RVE<3E~ A '
R19 M-AN9.wAR
_ TQ 85 ADIST DHA'}?.WAi). .. pmrwxonm
V {By srifl" suéfisii P HUDEDAGA£)DE,ADV(}CA'1'E}
............_--.----um-
" EJNIQN OFINDIA
" ~ VRE? BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
DEPTOF' SCHOOL
EDUCATION 85 L.i'I'ERACY
M1NIS'I'}?Y OF' HUMAN
'Cquxt folluwmg .
-2-
RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
NEW DELHI
2. 'THE DEPUTY COMMESSIONER
NAVOBAYA VEDYALAYA SAMITHI .
HYDERABAD REGION
SARABAR PATEL ROAD
SECUNMERABAD {AP}
3. THE PRINCIPAL
JAWAHAR NAVODAYA VIDYA YVA,
KYARAKOPPA ROAD -- "
DHARWAD~580007. p RESPONDENTS
{Ey Sri. S.N.RAJENDRA, ADVQCNEE Edi? R¥'1.é;'é.e2"
AND SR: AMARESHLAW A.ssoc:AmfEAs.,%»guvomwms
This' 'A lrE.tVP't:ti_1V_:Vi£)V£z cgxmmg on for hearing this day, the
-v .
ORDER
‘me gsfi’eva?:ce of the petitioner is that the raspondenE–
” éré net making cerrecfion in the school recards of the
petifioner dapite of the judgment and decree passed in
A % ;fs;No.13»5/2003.
V”
-3 –
2. The recerds disclose fiiat fire pefitioner filed
O.S.No.136/2003 before the learned Civil Budge (Jr.Dn.),
fer dedarafion that die caste of the plaintiff as
and not ‘Hindu Madar’. The said suit came tq _
27″‘ October 2003 declaring that uieipigiimwsicaeetist
Bhangi’ and not ‘Hindu Madarfl; Censeeeenfly,
in the suit were directed te _V in the
school recerde ef the petit§ener–‘:V: s;:>_ite””cif the decree, the
correcfion is net .:nade.VA…–v–itnote that the
defendants in thesi;i:iiis.e.i;hie me had filed R.A.No.1s/zms
before the Civ%l_vCoiift._fSf.Qn’;;)’ Gokak, which alse came to be
~ V26″; J’uEy._2C)0S as is dear from Annexure-‘ 3’ to the
the petiticmer made repraentatiore.
of Pubiic Instructions, Chikodi, has also
_ di3″ecte:i sense! to correct the relevant entries in the scheei
4 reeere§”A_pursuant to the judgment of the Civil Court. In spite of
‘ …”‘V’fnfe_”i’same, ewe 3″‘ respondent has not czompiied with the decree
we
-4…
passed by the Civil Court on the gmund that the
is not a party to the civil seit.
3. It is no doubt true that the 3?’? i-emnaeerisaea
party to the civil seit. The Kernateke. vvfieputy’
Director of Public Inwuctions ands’-l§itick”‘Educationl.Ofticer were
parties to die suit. They the State.
They have ever; en order of the trial
Court and have the decree of
the Civil consequently, the 3″‘
respondeht. should not be constrained to
file onemorel against 3″‘ respondent. At the time of
I-‘i’:v”fil–ingsziit,A_ the olaintiff was not studying in 3″‘ respondent
in Kadasiddahwara Kannada Medium
_Scheoi._._ Kc;fnnti:%’;’ Under such circurrastances, the 3′” respondent
not made party to the civil suit. In View 3′ the same,
direction has to be issued to we respondents to
‘T lljzzomizly wéth the direetioes issued in the civil suit. Accordingly,
the following order is made :
The 3″‘ rapondent — Principe}, Jawahaf
vidyaiaya, Dharwad, is directed in make ivrfvfiie V
column of caste of the petitioner as ‘ B1’!3l’\}’gfd_?.,J’A.Ai’l’I».t§.’l&n
of ‘ Hindu Madar’, as expedifioz:siy–§s~possibie,_’bLi£f’:1c$i::.iéi:é”V’ti1an
axe outer iimit of one mgsnigh fram’ of this
order.
Writ