IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C) No. 547 of 2005(M)
1. NALINI K.P.,
... Petitioner
2. MINI B.K.,
3. JAREENA H.,
4. LEELABAI A.,
5. MEERA P.,
6. REMA P.,
7. MAYAKUTTY K.K.,
8. ZAFFIYA M.,
9. LEKSHMIDEVI K.,
10. KUMARI K.,
11. USHA R.,
12. BHARATHY N.P.,
13. INDIRA C.,
14. YASODA M.,
15. SHAKKEELA A.,
16. NADHEERA A.,
17. SATHYABHAMA M.,
18. SHERLY C.V.,
19. ANITHA P.V.,
20. MAIMOONATH AYAR,
21. JAYASREE M.,
Vs
1. DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES,
... Respondent
2. THE DIRECTOR OF INSURANCE MEDICAL
3. THE INSURANCE MEDICAL OFFICER,
4. STATE OF KERALA,
For Petitioner :SRI.A.K.ALEX
For Respondent :GOVERNMENT PLEADER
The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH
Dated :19/07/2007
O R D E R
KURIAN JOSEPH , J
==================================
W.P.(C) NO. 547 OF 2005
==================================
Dated this the 19th day of July, 2007.
JUDGMENT
The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:
i. Declare the provisional service of petitioners as
regularised service and also to declare that they are
entitled to get increment and other service benefits on
the basis of the regularisation of service and seniority
may be fixed on that basis.
ii. issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ,
order or direction directing the 1st respondent to
consider and dispose of Ext.P25 to 44.
iii. direct the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of
Ext.P45.
2. It is stated that in the case of similarly situated persons,
regularisation has already been effected pursuant to Ext.P22 and
P23 judgment. If that be so, there is no point in discriminating
the petitioner. There will be a direction to the 1st respondent to
consider Exts.P25 to P44 and 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P45
and take appropriate action in the light of Exts. P22 and P23 and
extend the benefits given to the similarly situated persons
covered by the judgment to the petitioners herein also. It is also
made clear that the petitioner shall be granted eligible
W.P.(C). NO. 547/2007 : 2 :
consequential service benefits. The needful as above shall be
done within three months of the date of production of a copy of
the judgment by the petitioners.
The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE.
rv
W.P.(C). NO. 547/2007 : 3 :