IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANC}ALC)RE___
DATED THIS TI-{E am DAY OF JULY 2003 % [
BEFORE
THE HON"BLE MR. JUSTICE AJr;f»VJ.GUvi.a;;$:;;j Tff % A
WRIT PETITION No.30804/2oQ2′(s;R¢%s)%*%% % A 7
BETWEEN :
Nanda Naik,
W/o.D.Ka1asw&;my’,_Nai1’g2._ »
No.11?/4, 23¢ Bl:).c}:,1l;__ ” A
3rd Stage, s*.G.’Ha13:, ”
Basaveshwa1’nagar,’~”.V–~.__»K ‘ –
Bangalore –~}56() 079. …PE’I’I’I’IONER
(By %s;ri.satésh, Acivfibr?
” .M.V.Vetiacha71a, Adv.)
~Puw’c:r_
Cnrpotatidz} bviiillilited,
N032’; Shaldhifihavan,
Race”=C01f£’S«’3 «Road,
Bangalore«._—- 1.
‘A 1 ‘ ‘ —- Regoreseritéd by its
‘ Director.
2. Jayatheertha,
The Chief HRD Manager,
KPCL, # 82, Shakti Bhavan,
Race Course Road, ‘ =
Bangaiore — 560 001. …RESP{3f€vDEN’FS * _
(By Sri.S.N.1\&urthy &
Sri.Somashekar,- Advs.)
This writ petition is med t1tid’ei*jAEtie1esA22’6′”end
227 of the Constitution of inclia ‘withvva”prayer to call for
records of Selecticm process respect of selection of the
candidate to the postof system ”
This writ this day,
the Court made t21e”fol}o}av’i1;”g;__”* ” 3′
. ,QRBERt
The ;petitioIte1* ;is”c’;1uestior1i2:1g the selection process.
is to be noticed that the selected
made a party. In fact this
‘.VV1ietition “is =;i:ié.bie to be rejected for noI1~joir1der of
e parties.
K Another prayer of the petitioner is for
.:_锑eo;4’§;siderat:io:1 of her representation at Armexure ‘C’
‘elated 09.08.2002. The petitioner claims that she is a
fl”
be issued. On these gounds, I am of the View that
petitioner is next entitied for any of the reliefs.
Petition stands rejested.
Rule dimzharged.
SP8