O1,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 08"' DAY OF DECEMBER. 2010
BEFORE
THE I-ION'BLE MRJUSTICE B.S. PATIL
W.P.No.11767/2008(GM----CPC) T O
BETWEEN:
Nan] amma,
W/0 late S.R.B0reg0wda,
Aged about 46 years,
R/ at Raj endrapura Village, _V
Huliyurdurga Hobli, "
Kuniga1Ta1uk, Tumkur DistriCt._ B
{By Sri B.N.ShiVanna, 'A
AND:
1.
S/o:,H.L.Lihga.ppa¥,V , '
Majdr, ' O ' T "
R / at Hangara}.1a11fi_V'V 1110. ghe",
Huliyuréiurga I-Iobli, "
Kumgal Tailuk.' ~
T 2. H--;Y.S.heik ..N00ruddih,
V 0 Yaa_sin"Sab @ Babasaheb,
" .Maje0r: " V
3." 'I:§;Y.Shei1{-_S2;11auddin,
S'/0 Yaasfn Sab @ Babasaheb,
' Maj"0r._ 3
. Regapondents 2 and 3 are
Residents of Hosapete,
Hutridurga Hobli, Kunigal Taluk,
" Tumkur District.
«. .PETITIONER
RESPONDENTS
+2,
(By Sri H.G.Shivanand, Adv. for R1.
Sri K.B.Raghu, Adv. for R2 8: 3)
This writ petition is filed under Articies 226 and 227 of
the Constitution of India praying to quash the order dated
18.7.2008 passed on LA No.2, by the learned Cixrii-___ Judge
(Sr.Dn.), Kunigal in O.S.67’/O6 which is marked as AnneX1ire–D
by allowing the LA No.2 fiied by the petitioner and’-.th_er.eby
impleading the petitioner as defendant No.3 in th’e’a’oove:_.suit
and etc. 5 =
This writ petition coming on.:fo1′-.Pre§€iminarly’ I9iearinIg–B’; ‘
Group this day, the Court made theIio1iovviA.ng:’.-pp ”
9-3933
Sri B.N.Shivanna, 1earned’V’eo:ikh.sei for.th’e files a
memo dated o8.12.2o10′:Wm’ ‘pan-i”{0n does not
survive for consideration be dismissed
as having become’in§7ructuoi1s..’
Memois piaeedV.dn–~._re’eord. Writ Petition is dismissed as
having. becorne infriictiious.
Sd/9
H}’DGE