High Court Karnataka High Court

Narasimhaiah S/O … vs State Of Karnataka on 31 July, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Narasimhaiah S/O … vs State Of Karnataka on 31 July, 2008
Author: Subhash B.Adi
-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THE; THE 31" DAY OF JULY, 2008
BEFORE

THE HONBLE MR.JUSTiCE SUBHASH mm  D' D D' 

Narasimhaiah.

Sio. Ghikkanarayanappa.

Aged about 55 years,

Residing at Colony

Chikkabettahalii,

Vidyaranyapura Post.

Yaiahanka Hobii,  '      " -.

Bangalore North Taluk.    _    '  ':=.;,.F*ETIT!0NER

(By srs; M;$9}Q'Rg§an¢1fa"i°r§s§d;Adx:,§'

1. $1ateofKa'ma'£alca -    
ByYalahanka Satelite  . 
Town Police,  " 
BAN€3£d;t")fiE.

2.'-_ Narayanarsm. D' 
1 usfg, Chikkgriarieysnappa,
Residing at Catony,
 Chilci-:abetta,§uallij;.-- A
 «Vidyaranya%pura'Pcst.

--  ":f,alaharaka_¥'-iobli,

'= * sangaiore North Taiuk.  RESPONDENTS

(By Sri. Honnappa. HCGP for R1
Sri. Myiaraiah Associates. Advs. for R2)

-uuuu-an

This Cri.P is filed UfS.482 C:.P.C. praying to quash the

Aiffsoceetiingficomplaint in Crime NO.21€)f2007 of the 1″ respondent

police.

This petition coming on for admission this day. the Court made

the foiiowirrgz
S2.BJ2.E.B

Petifioner has sought for quashina of compiaint registered in
Crime No.210f200? by the Yeiahanka Sateiite Town Police.

2. Respondent No.2 flied a complaint against

aiisging that, he and his two brothers have got _i’a”hds: ii 2

Sy.Nos.-215.4832 and 51:1. For the share of m§42″€-irs§’p§nom5i;’-ha’ ‘g-gag

iand to the extent or 18 Guntas. 1 Acwanei 8 csiuntés anaiir

rwpectiveiy. The petitioner herein by his
Generai Power of Attorney and .’_regg:ist’ers_d;tiis Rsiesss Deed.
Based on the said compiairxt, ms ihaérsi iihs case.

3. Learned submitted that. there is s
civii dispute esndine as such. the complaint for the
aiisosdi ofiieiics_’..iA,:is mt mainsiinabie. The aiiegation made in {he
oorripisinr’r:issii3r_:’rsvssis. she aiiegafion of forgery. The compiaint

s»…_r_snreais brirha’ faoieivsssvoagainst the petitioner and I find no reason for

_ _:7::iiria:-airing: the pzoosedinn just because there is oivii dispute pending.

41 V’ in’visu§r ofviihe same. this pefition is dismissed. Liberty is reserved

é ‘ the to take aii such contentions in the proceedings.

Sd/-v

.;AP,m Juagé