" ~ ' ~ ' Nag:=iih_¢£naha31i .. .. AA Thgndebavi Hobli " Gtixaéribidanur Taluk _ Shri. V. S. Jagzinatli, Advcxzate for Fetilioncrs Nos. 1 to 4, " Shri. M. 'L Iagan Mohan for proposed fer Petitiontzr No. 5} IN THE HIGH COURT 0? KARNATAKA AT * DATED mxs THE 15"?" DAY & L THE I-10N°3LE MR. JUSTICE;-xNA1$:t3 WRIT 1>E'r1T13éJ %?~I_<2;f.:*3?4$§ <3?£%'A%A2c~1 BETWEEN: A 1. Narasiyapfi; J 70 years . SE0 Bavirnal --~ ' ' 3- Sri. Pu1l2ViV'1:;;3iu§,?$ j;s;='a4i§¥s'" Sfo;3anjc¢vaiah " " V' at Taiide.-in Majaru " Kaiar District «- 561 213 . . . PETYFIONERS é id AND: 1. Siam of Karnataka By its Principal Secretary Revenue Departtnetat M. S. Buiiding Bangalore»! 2. Land Tribunal Gowribidnmzr Taiuk Gowribidanur Kolar Distxict 3. Narasimhaswgmy and _, Represented V. GQwri1i2§da1;*;_r" * KoIaxv'VDistrictV5 .v _ 7'; ' 4. subb:a¢._Bead 'by'i:ijs_L'.'R_ai' Majer, S/0 " ' R.fi§de1__1t.ofNa.'20.. %%%%% . . «M: S. Ran Road ' C _Ba.¢ga3u;:p-+4 RESPONDENTS
Vv _ (By Sathyanarayan Sirzgh, Guvermrncnl Ficader for
Responcignis Nos. 1 to 3, Shri. G. L. Vishwa:xath,, Advocate far
< H K A' wlfieagxygzdefil N0. 4)
##3##
1%
Hanumegowda and Narasimhzsiah are eeneerned
that the matter is pending een:sideratim:r.' " ~.
3. In the meanwhile, theVgefimfiérgV:cm;1e§§dAV’.ig;iat’,,h–§;:vi§;g~ti”
regard to the pmvisiun which £9; meg no. 7
having been extended, .4 an application
seeking same is pending
mmsideratiomi” contend that they were
tenants iga” relevant date, namely,
dated notice of the proceedings as
regards gag Sam iehaw been filed by amhak Subbarae
proceedings otherwise and flnerefow,
u no opportunity it: challenge or contest the
_elaim”‘ef Asuhbamu and hence, the fact that the peliiitmers
‘ the earns: week} be irrelevant, insofiar as the
having iadependentiy flied an seeking
T ” rights in Form no. 7 which has. been legitimateiy filed
within the time prescsibed and therefore there is no impediment in
7:
mogxmed only because, an has been V’ > é ,
by them. This xwuld be a travesty ufiiiiéiitgc. gym
held entitled to upset orders ‘~ n
6. Insulin: as the 1 to the
grant of occupancy and
Natasimhaiah an application
filed by the ,.s.;.;s wouid was It) a
relevant am
V?” I; that as amid be seen fmrn the
filed by the peanmm are under the
(Personal and Miscellaneous) Inams
V 1954 and are nevi pmowdings which can be
‘ by the Tribumi and simx: the mspomicnls claim an
& 1 right which has crystaliised and aiiained finality in
year 1986, the petitioners being permitted to re-open these
“5
19
Insofiir as the rcsgxmdcnls are concerned
made by the in their Form :;i{:$A.h 7,’
be permitted {(3 contest the chasm ggad matgegtifito %
my The Tribunal shall ien”:§§« these A
prowtsdiags while ._ the
same on merits inqiudingALt:a::’i:=s1f§:VA¢pfE§fn§lé£!§efi which may be
raised instafiar as conccmed.
Ammsngjy, g.g,agPc.;1;¢;.,;sau;.,w.,a and the order of
the Tribufiaal fié figiashai- The matter is mmamicd
in the Land re-txms2dcra’ lion and disgxaesu I in
wiatg the light of the observations made
of the are left open.
35%
§§§§@
