High Court Karnataka High Court

Narayana S/O Munegowda vs The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd on 22 November, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Narayana S/O Munegowda vs The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd on 22 November, 2010
Author: B.Sreenivase Gowda


1

Hi THE. IfiGH cazzms 01? KARE’A”i’AKA AT amsamgs

mmn ms Tm 22% my 0?’ §3<JEamm;2t:,1é"V«.%«

BEFGRE

Tim HGIVBLE 1«m.az.:s"r1cE a.3§éE;§1yasy;

.o………s.'……..–a…….«

mnavmm am –« V "

AGEDABG1′.}’Z{’26YEAm,” # L
R1,–.1TIBfl{tIR~5?2 am

%2%%k%’D:1:Aé%$Ms:§m2 aw mama? mam
smmam mama games,
Bzzaaunwa, wmm

V’ V’ .. 3 ‘ _a$ABBEa Ammn snmm

* ._ _A3:{OABI}UL 3UB.&K 3HARI$F’F’
{33RII%IG*ERE;

QGRDZGERE HQELI,
‘1″£IB£Bi’€.}’R YALUK & D$’I’RIC’i’
RE$F’€}¥DEI§”3§S

” (mam: B 3 £Ifl$fl,AEr’J. ma R1, R2 & R3 SERVED}

%’

M.F.A. N0.4782/20:35%%%%(Mvc;% % 1 %

2

mm man U;&l73{}} 9;? av ACT .mm%T%m%g

wnamm & AWARI) BATED 2?i2£3}’2G$6 PA$EE7i3rfE§’v..
mm m*oms4;% ON 7’33 mg ca? Tim mva::fi:2;;;J:.Ij;’mE;,V %
MKCT, cmrm’ oz? Sfifiii musm, ~I.fB§’F$§§}”i:-fifi, 4_
wrmmmm AREA, magmas {SC(3_}i.—103;, Pygmy ” . ”
zuwwme mm Guam zwrrrxcx yaixzz»-c;mufiE;2sI3;;a:rI¢:;z§1;.asF’..

SEEKERS: Emmcgnmm or Cr¥:>Mi?_ErIf.i§Afffi$%35i.” 1.

mm APPEAL czammzeama mR.mams5@§” ° fjm

mar, ‘£’.’£-IE mam’: DELIVERED FOL£G__WI1¥fG;~””.. “‘
JGDGMEHI {%-

This appeal is bf-._§i1¢ ‘£939′ enhanaement
of connperasatian’ «aswardexfi
§_ %%%% Ram, a mitted am with the
ce:1s<az:£~.~;§f. ~ apgagazing for ths

pazfieg, iéé ffirs 'final disgesai.

'A ' : the sake of mnwnicncq, the paxtiea are

are rsfsrred to 1'11 the clam petitien

V 'v .V beféf}:

.. s The bricffasts af tht case:

fin 23.84.2966, when tha szziaimant was

VT “£:z’é:sm11in.g in 3. bus baaring regktraiiarx No. KA~&6—A-

6%”

3

246$ as 3. §a.sse21g¢r mt: Eioéfimallmurs.-ééclara Raga,

rxear Thénmurukcrez Area; the driver sf’ the V.

draw the same in a. rash and neg11′.ge:1’£,_ K

caused asmident. A3 a, ramzit, fie

injuries. Hams; he filed 3, pgaizm b§fé:sé,’ 2$£A{:’f§ %

Bangalsre seskfixg §3ampae:z1sé;*:§é§a:1.Vgf 21%:
The Triburzal réjrmpensatien of
Rs.58,i3C3{1$j’- with §z;’£a:rc:$’£ a:: >es%:wp;’.éL;v_ ‘

‘ 5. giisgyute r
:.3cc1:rré:’1c:e’~:’0fva$§c¢i§§i:zj;€;%3;egiig¢11<3¢ and fiahflity sf tha

iitmurer df' Vécfliclej tha snly pcrint that

v fags? my (.3ti3f£3Z:fifi§'&tiE3fl in this apyeai is:

T _ :V"'sj2§§%f%3;te;t1'zcr ihfi compcfisatien avsardad
'iliig is just and reamnable Q1"
ds-13$ it;c&3l far anhansement?"

.A§.'=- 'Afc¢:r haarixg the iaarmzz Cmmsa}

far 'him partsfm and perzxsing the fazdment

VT award ef me Tribunal; i am af thc View that :11:

V " campensation awardaé by the Tr1'hu.fia1 is net just and

%'$/.

reasenablcg it is cm. the tower aide axui hencz it £3

zaqtzimdl ta be enhanaeé.

‘L7. The claimant has sustained the

ir3j’:zric:&:–

a3 Laceraxed wmund. os.fiev.;:;”AAI9’*xr.=fi:~’j:siL\%sv?’ V

with fiactum sf mmctibie—T .. 9 –

B} Tfuea teeth faflcn. dmvézfiue ta ”

:3} weeding fiorn the; aaiia a»f’i:1_§’a.1:’§’
6%.} Tip fiacmm cf dgiifghzzmemsg

‘f’hc injuricas are
evidant fiunz the Vmadiciai 8; %, X-rays

Exs.P- by am} evidence at’ the:
claimant ‘I’h.e ciaimant has :16:

a 3133 ;&:$c;*£»;%:r.Az+’aega1’t1§11g diaability.

I the naturt «sf injizrim,

L gwamea by the mbunaz mwams ‘pair;

‘ W H K is just md pmper and thsere is rm smpe

éfihanaermnt tmfier this head.

9. As Rs.-5,M0!»« asvwfied by the Tribunal

towards ‘medical wpmlsw’ is bfied an the medium}
(56

5

bifls praducgd by the: claimant fer Rs.4,4§8f~–

there fa my amp: far’ mxhancemeni under ”

IG. Tha claimant wfi maméé K V’

Jmifxa Pfuming Home,

the wme, Rn.2,000I- ” L’

towards ‘incidental feaszpensxg’ *Aé3:u:f;h_._as
naurishment and attéfsriaiivt is just and

prcaper and tlgerg s£§:fifie”«fc§i;–i€:1i;§ncemm.t urzder

11] __’I’}”;c ‘ms is be: weridng in «ii

panic;-iflnm a. sum cf Rs.5;D{)O/~ per

saififi is mt aastabiished by pred1.u:;1’ng

tha absentzc ofpmaf af inceme, thfi

V Trih§iLr:a§I: ai2a*§¢.asir1g his magma at Rag3§Gm/- per’

mnsiderim tile tmamant period as 2

has rightly’ awar&d 3. sum of m.a,oeo;-

V _ ” fiificfards ‘lmfi. csf incama dwfing iaifi mg pezisd’.

%

6

12. Even thawh tha C t

exmthed the damn: thfi:

cenaiciering ma natura rasf :;)f K V’

discczmfesrt and unhappiness {tag ?’§;:T§a” 1″m:a

uxxdergs in his ftltum fife; cf ” L’

Rs.15,aDGi- tmrds Aéxxa; is

:10 wage for anhanceméifi .A§;c§ a_{_i,

13. Ag _.;}g ma:1_’A1 §:§£:;r{ am.1r:ned’ thc

dccztar H fizxesfion cf awarding
c9mpaf:$ati¢n ‘lass of futu:’e itzzsxzme’

dues 130$ I’J__:§§1:§:*t’§i§’c1$m§ cenaicicrixxg that the

‘~ s1i$’I.:s:_.+?*’r=_»;.**:.vd fiactura af mandibie and right

leaf: tlrzrw tmth, it is just and

tag’ 3. man: asf Rs.18.,O’99l- tmvards ‘mat

” ‘ »- ‘ ~ ‘e.-zsf 0ri@_’17:,a:E teeth’.

éxccordiwy, the appaai ifi aflmned in part.

% jtzdgmant and mvgrd passed by the Txibzzzzal fa.

mnéifieé he the mien: stated herein aéwtse. T1216

7′
claimant fa cntitiad far an additfimal esmp<&nsaI5aVr3_b::f

m..1s,mo with irztemst at 6% pa. fimm H

claim paefition an the data efrealisaxian.

15. The: insuxazxm

depmfi: the enhanced com¢pe1;sai4i:};:1 “‘.ame1::i.’:. ‘V *’

with intemat wtithifi we mama fi’»9:§%m.’«_”;:i.i’:e . d3,3.taa af
receipt 91″ a carpy af v,TA$..*’1:;i thfi éame is

arderesd ta relcaacd in vfavfipgzr A

1 £ fags. :tez’_’§;~0ist?.V,W