Court No. - 28 Case :- BAIL No. - 5377 of 2010 Petitioner :- Narendra Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Petitioner Counsel :- Sudhaker Verma Respondent Counsel :- Govt.Advocate Hon'ble Shri Kant Tripathi,J.
Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned AGA and perused
the record.
The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the alleged recovered
quantity of diazapam was less than the commercial quantity and no public
witness was called at the time of the alleged recovery and the recovery has
been planted by the police to falsely implicate the applicant.It was also
submitted that the applicant is in jail from 11.4.2010.
There does not appear to be any reasonable ground to believe that the
applicant will temper with the witnesses or abscond, if released on bail.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the
accused, the severity of the punishment and submissions of the learned
counsel for the applicant and the learned AGA, I am of the view that the
applicant has made out a case for bail.
Let the applicant Narendra Singh involved in case crime No. 150 of 2010
under sections 21/22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,
1985, P.S. Rewsa, District Sitapur be released on bail on his furnishing a
personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of
the court concerned and also subject to the following conditions:
1. the applicant will continue to attend the court concerned on the date
fixed;
2. the applicant will not tamper with the witnesses;
3. the applicant will not indulge in any illegal activities during the period
of bail.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at
liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 20.7.2010
MTA