High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Naresh Kumar Sinha vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 16 September, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Naresh Kumar Sinha vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 16 September, 2011
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                         Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2828 of 2000
                                      Naresh Kumar Sinha
                                               Versus
                                  The State Of Bihar & Ors
                                  ----------------------------------

9. 16.9.2011 While hearing was concluded and the order was to be

dictated this Court would find that certain explanations on behalf

of the respondents are lacking in the counter affidavit/

supplementary counter affidavit.

List this case after three week in order to enable Mr.

S.K.Mandal, learned counsel for the State, to apprise this Court as

to whether a teacher appointed initially on stipend with a

qualification of B.Sc. or I.Sc. trained on being regularized in

service would be entitled to basic post of Matric trained teacher or

will be given the post of I.Sc. trained and B.Sc. trained. Such

query has to be answered by the State in keeping with the facts of

the petitioner who came to be appointed before 1986 when direct

appointment even on the post of B.Sc. trained teacher and I.Sc.

trained teacher was envisaged apart from promotion on such post.

The petitioner in fact claims that he was given such B.Sc. trained

scale of pay by the D.S.E., Patna on 19.4.1989 (Annexure 7) in

view of the order of the State Government dated 20.11.1982

wherein it was prescribed that a person appointed on stipend

would be entitled to payment of salary as per his qualification and

since the petitioner on the date of his being appointed as a teacher

on stipend was holding the qualification of B.Sc. trained, he also

was given such benefit by the competent authority, namely,

D.S.E., Patna.

2

The respondents, therefore, are directed to file their

supplementary counter affidavit explaining all these aspects and

also the fact as to whether the order passed in favour of the

petitioner granting him B.Sc. trained scale of pay, as contained in

Annexure 7, was ever cancelled by a specific order after

complying the principle of natural justice.

List this case after three weeks under the heading

‘for hearing’ at the top of the list as a tied up matter.

Let a copy of this order be given to Mr. S.K.Mandal,

S.C.24 for its strict compliance.

(Mihir Kumar Jha,J.)

Surendra/