IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.896 of 2011
In
(CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE 1116/2001)
Naresh Paswan & Anr
Versus
The State Of Bihar & Ors
----------------------------------
with
Letters Patent Appeal No.339 of 2010
IN
(CIVIL REVIEW 35/2009)
Naresh Paswan & Anr
Versus
The State Of Bihar & Ors
———————————-
3 16-09-2011 Both the appeals relate to the same matter and
between the same parties. The appeal against rejection of
review by the writ court is L.P.A. No. 339 of 2010. The
writ petitioner who is respondent has appeared in that
appeal but not in L.P.A. No. 896 of 2011. However,
learned counsel for the appellants accepts notice in L.P.A.
No. 898 of 2011 also. Let a copy of memorandum of appeal
as well as limitation petition be served on Mr. Ratan Deep
Prasad, Advocate for respondent no.4 by 19th September,
2011. Let the name of Mr. Ratan Deep Prasad , Advocate
appear in both the appeals as counsel for the respondent.
Receipt showing service of notice upon counsel for
respondent no.4 in L.P.A. No. 898 of 2011 must be filed
within one week, failing which the memorandum of appeal
as against respondent no.4 shall stand dismissed without
2
further reference to a Bench.
On behalf of writ petitioner a prayer has been
made for seeking instruction in respect of limitation petition
as well as in respect of appeal and to file counter affidavit,
if required.
As prayed, let both the appeals be listed under the
same heading after four weeks.
The appeals shall retain their position in the list.
It is made clear that appeals may be disposed of
finally on the next date.
( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)
( Shivaji Pandey, J)
Naresh
