Gujarat High Court High Court

Nataraj vs Jam on 17 October, 2008

Gujarat High Court
Nataraj vs Jam on 17 October, 2008
Author: S.R.Brahmbhatt,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/12133/2008	 1/ 1	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 12133 of 2008
 

=========================================================


 

NATARAJ
CERAMICS & CHEMICALS INDUSTRIES LTD.THROUGH - Petitioner
 

Versus
 

JAM
NAGARJAN KAYABHAI C/O.BHARTIYA MAZDOOR SANGH - Respondent
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance : 
MR
YATIN SONI for Petitioner: 1,MR NIRAJ J SHAH for
Petitioner: 1, 
MR MUKESH B DAVE for Respondent:
1, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT
		
	

 

Date
: 17/10/2008 

 

ORAL
ORDER

The
discretion under Section 11(A) is exercised without substituting the
penalty which was awarded after detailed inquiry, wherein, the
workman was found guilty. The award impugned, therefore, is required
to be examined from that angle. Hence, Rule.

Mr.

N.J. Shah, learned counsel for Mr. Soni for the petitioner submitted
that the petitioner has already reinstated the respondent workman
without prejudice to their rights and contention to challenge the
award. In view of this, by way of interim relief, the order of
reinstatement is not stayed as the workman has been reinstated
without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petition and
the order regarding back wages is therefore required to be stayed and
accordingly, it is stayed till final disposal of the matter.

pallav
(S.R.BRAHMBHATT, J.)

   

Top