Posted On by &filed under Gujarat High Court, High Court.


Gujarat High Court
National vs Amarshibhai on 29 January, 2010
Author: H.K.Rathod,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CA/13642/2009	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION - FOR STAY No. 13642 of 2009
 

In


 

FIRST
APPEAL No. 4648 of 2009
 

 
=====================================
 

NATIONAL
INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

AMARSHIBHAI
AMTHUBHAI & 1 - Respondent(s)
 

===================================== 
Appearance
: 
MR MAULIK J SHELAT for
Petitioner(s) : 1, 
None for Respondent(s) : 1, 1.2.1, 1.2.2,
1.2.3, 1.2.4, 1.2.5,1.2.6 - 2. 
=====================================
 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD
		
	

 

Date
: 29/01/2010 

 

 
ORAL
ORDER

1. Heard,
learned Advocate Mr. MJ Shelat, appearing on behalf of applicant and
learned Advocate Ms. Amrita Ajmera, appearing on behalf of respondent
nos. 1/1 to 1/6.

2. Rule.

Ms. Ajmera waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent
nos. 1/1 to 1/6. With consent of both learned Advocates, the matter
is taken up for Final Hearing.

3. Interim
Relief granted in terms of Para 3(A) on a condition that the
appellant – applicant shall deposit entire amount of award together
with cost and interest before the Claims Tribunal, Surendranagar
within a period of 06 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of
present order. After realizing the said amount from applicant –
appellant – Insurance Company, it is directed to Claims Tribunal,
Surendranagar to pay 30% amount by A/c. Payee Cheque in the name of
Amarshibhai Amthubhai after proper verification. The rest of the
amount is to be invested in the Nationalized Bank for a period of 03
years in the name of respondent – claimant but FDR shall remain with
the Nazir of the Claims Tribunal. The said FDR shall be renewed
periodically till the appeal is finally decided. The respondent –
claimant is entitled to periodical interest upon the said FDR till
the appeal is finally decided by this Court.

4. Rule
is made absolute to the aforesaid extent accordingly.

[
H. K. Rathod, J. ]

hiren

   

Top


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

11 queries in 0.350 seconds.