8 1. . M..s§'e'Ahé%1Ada"ppa Aged -.ab-out 51 "yea rs, Secretary IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS "ma 11*" DAY 05 NOVEMBER 2610 BEFORE : THE I-ION'8LE MRJUSTICE MOHAN sHANTANAe§LI.pAjR warr PETITLQN i\lQ§.3_,§1Q2--1§1fi,,L'=§Z2Q'3;Q. W I'! I Navachethana Vldya Samasthe _ Parents and Teachers Society No.20/20, 20"' Cross E " * Bhuvaneshwarinagar Magadi Road, Ban_qa!ore~56_O Q23 1' Rep by Its Secret4a:r'y._ _' _ - M.S. Anandapp:-_;-i . Hanumanthav F?~Ve':<fil.r,V.*:5,'.» ' Aged ab€)Ut'E'52AV\;'earsiA;'Pre-sid-ent Navachetha_n.a V:»::£v.a 'Sarna'st_he_ _* Parents and' Teacheer''s..Seoci'ety' . No.20/20,' 20*'*"_ Cross-». * Bhuvaneshwarinagar ' Magadi' -Read, t3angaIore--560 023 Navachetiaana V"'w_.Iv1V<_:i.ya Samasthe Pa're'n«t's and.jTe'achers Society No.2-Q/2Q~,~.310T" Cross I Bhuvarjeshwarinagar "Megadi R_.0'ad, Banga!ore--560 O23 ."!\(i;'R.- Veeranna * Aged about 59 years firjrrespondent
Navachethana Vidya Samasthe
Parents and Teachers Society
No.20/20, 20″‘ Cross
Bhuvaneshwarinagar
Magadi Road, Bangaiore-560 O23. ..Pet’i’tio’nAe’rsf*– :”
(By Sri M.S. Parthasarathi, Adv.,)
ADA 1
1. The Registrar of Societies
Bangaiore Urban District
Aii Askar Road, Bangalore.
2. Ashok
Age Major _ .
Navachethana Vidy’a,__Sairi’astI1e
Parents and Teachers Society-e~~”
No.20/20, 2C__i”‘* Cros_s_g’. ” __
Bhuvaneshwé1’rin:a’Ci~ar . ‘
Magadi Ro.ad_, “Ba’nga_i_ore.:SEi:O’ ..Respondents
(By Sri R. ‘ ‘
Sri H.C.Shivaramu, ‘AVdV._:,’.foi~.__R’2)…-
Th€se Writ” getitions’=_are”iVfiied under Articles 226 & 227
of the Ci:institution’o.f India praying to quash the order dated
:.fi3’*.v1.20.10 ~.1–idevv..,§.nnexure—L passed by the first respondent.
.§§et.itions coming on for preliminary hearing
in ‘.3Cg’r.oyaJp’rt.!’iis__d~a’y;’ the Court made the following :
QBDER
is The petitioners have sought for quashing the order vide
‘Z_xn’n’ew$<'ure~'L' dated 3.1.2010 passed by the 15' respondent,
W
$3..
by which the list of office bearers and the audited accounts of
the Society are cancelied.
2. During the course of arguments on
was submitted on behalf of respondent No;’A.2″
petitioners 2 and 3 are not the'”‘me«rhbers_:V.”of:v’._the–‘.i’i~I’i”-my
petitioner-Society, whereas, petitione’r«yNo~.,_S4′ is theyA’rneinbe’r~.of’~._
the Society. Since there is serifousidispuhtevwithSregard”tojthe S’
status of the respondents.» 12 andA..i2’mrh’o”a-»re the President and
member of the Society!’ this’ ‘consent of the
advocates on tioth ‘_:’dia’eVcté_d_Vthesiioint Registrar of
Co–opera,tiyeH’Sei:Vi.ety;3.yiiajngfaiore.Viitegion, to independently
verify the’faVcts% afterA:heSa’rin:g’«.the parties and to submit the
factuai A,report.a”‘ T’he.V’,’-faictuafiv report of the Joint Registrar of
Co.~operaatii.v-e Societie§,””Bangaiore Region, is produced before
the memo by the teamed Government
Advocate. y7i?he§*..–r’eport reveais that petitioners 2 and 3 are the
-.,{./tjv»-V’~_iT’i-Emberé the Society and that they have paid $502/~ and
(4506,/_–‘fespectively towards subscription. The said report of
.the__53oint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Bangaiore
\/S
While deciding the matter, the report of the Joint Registrar of
Cmoperative Societies dated 20.9.2010 produced
Court shall be taken into consideration.
*bk/nk
MSG,l :
23.11.2010 eeee N ”
ORDERON T0
N9 further’ is However, it is open for the
petitiorxers te’q:1estieAn:.the:’Correctness of the report made by the
iéienp RegistfarAVBef0re’tii¥3L”§–e1rsfiVfespondent.
Sd/4
JUDGE