Karnataka High Court
Naveena Kumari vs Anjaneya on 5 August, 2008
Efl ?EE HEQH fiQfiET Q? §%RN%E&K%§ R&NGALGKE.a mawgm TREE wax 3" way $5 %¥§$$T 2Q$a=f* gfa EEEQEE wag fiQm*mLE fix: $w$wxma HmE;Nfifl%M§Hfi§ fiEx* uwunwmm-on §§%.m& ?E§EQ%S; * any EWWEENR Kfimfifii Wffi fimfifififififififlfiwfifif . fifififi ARQBT 33 wmaa§§_w-_a gym &&K§HfiE§ER&,A= 1 ,_; . -,. : $EfifiwAN?gymaHfima§$._*'1,' 4 \" "" $EEflK%fiflN&VflEE#E%§® ._vV_'_" ' B&%%&1$fiE magTgi§Amwx.*Qa" Rfiwfifikfiéfi 33% mg? " ' * ' '~ "« mm: &??E@&RNT as? $3: gwgfiafifiwéfifi, Aav,; 2~'~'a.z%'£'s : V §£fi&mfi$ _ _ a§£mT2&mE*$xazY&§@& §$&fi fifim¥$ §?"EEfiR$§ Kf3 Nfl.K%K1?§; EKQCK E3 '_ yayga Eflwm; .w- X rBR%QRfiVfiTHI 5?? 3&3 §%§£§$$§§A3E€ T,%§fi'a&?E GIRIE&§E% . "§&£fi flBflflT 38 ymaafig .u'fiEEEEERE *.wEgaw&Nwfi§ma wmmn: fifififififlfififlflvfififl Eflfif Efififififlflfifi fififi fififl an REfi§QNBEfiT§ §R3"fiE;¥Rfi§ R1 §ERWEQE'fiELfl $¥§FKSIERT} (:7Ly\/k chin. ..ansun nlnflnsnnnuusmlrllll can .u..anan-. un;n.uns xlnwnsnnnnsnslann any -u.uan.an.an sangu- |...l|In.lIQ...lAInll..)AI nan. snuannnan nununuu. n_nun'_-uu_z-nuns-n_:nu :1; uurflvnfinln stamina. t_1cI\.tiu.1nt\|I..n\I :3 uurunpnfln I ..
imgmmmam flgfirmamfi amfi. fiamxaa mi thg trial
fifimgt xaquixfifi mwdifiiaatiwm.
“NM
qr: V.’ w ( ”
wm&1wMLm$2
:'<''. *3 ,.
.;.f;”i:»3.: ::’5*;,”g;::§§;1£,»’&«.%aI}, H}.”;W” ‘ ” V’ a;l._”§;’£;g&«.”fa;2e;i. TEEQ
: ,,._ .W,;* ~’w,..:’ ‘ .7′ ..’*
;m§um&w¢V wwmgmenfi fiflfi
nhfi txial
”’i x’»’ “1 »x ” \:
imnzz LE
xfii$’%fi§7$w&xaeimg tha fiuit
yaxfmrmafimw wf
Wtawmami Gijfi&i@%§$%§%flfi ta Khfi fiitla cf
tna g%$%mfi&mtm afifizé achafimia yxflflaxty 2%
Lx&@r%fi
mmxdammiyu
t§’@:mmm§flfi
Sd/-=
Judge
;;, Emx fihfi xfimaamm mvatafi’ fibwvéy fine,
__ ___- . ..-_ __- __ -…………. -_ ..-..a.¢.a. p-nun. glI.l|.niI..l’II’\I\..J\l lli I\l!\l\fi.
unsung. n-¢-.. – _.. .-. — …… …….