Navneet vs Bhairavsinh on 12 July, 2011

  
 Gujarat High Court Case Information System 
    
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SA/79/2011	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SECOND
APPEAL No.79 of 2011
 

 
 
=========================================
 

NAVNEET
RATILAL SHAH & 1 - Appellant(s)
 

Versus
 

BHAIRAVSINH
JALAMSINH RAJPUT - Defendant(s)
 

========================================= 
Appearance: 
MR
JAYRAJ CHAUHAN for
Appellant(s): 1 - 2. 
MR HARSHADRAY A DAVE for Defendant(s):
1, 
=========================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MS. JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 12/07/2011 

 

 
ORAL
ORDER

1. Heard
Mr. Jayraj Chauhan, learned advocate for the appellants.

2. Admit.

The following substantial questions of law arise for determination:-

Whether
on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate
Court was justified in holding that the requirements of a statutory
notice under section 12(2) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging
House Rates Control Act, 1947 had not been satisfied?

Whether
on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate
Court was justified in holding that the respondent had deposited the
arrears of rent as contemplated under sub-section (3) of section 12
of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act,
1947?

(
Harsha Devani, J. )

hki

Top