High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Nawal Rai@ Nawal Kishore Prasad … vs The State Of Bihar on 5 September, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Nawal Rai@ Nawal Kishore Prasad … vs The State Of Bihar on 5 September, 2011
                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Criminal Miscellaneous No.26502 of 2011
                   Nawal Rai@ Nawal Kishore Prasad Yadav, son of Brij Raj Rai,
                   resident of village - Romarpur Bendi, P.S. - Piprahi, District -
                   Sheohar.
                                                                  --------- Petitioner.
                                                  Versus
                   The State of Bihar                        -------Opposite Party
                                                 *****

For the petitioner : Mr. Md. Sharfuddin, Adv.
For the State : Mr. Lalan Kumar, APP
*****

02. 05.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in

connection with Piprahi P.S. Case No.

37 of 2011, pending in the court of S.D.J.M.,

Sitamarhi, is one of the named accused in this case

relating to some disturbance in election for the post of

Mukhiya.

Submission is that he carries no specific

allegation, his name emerged only on disclosure by co-

apprehended accused who has been enlarged on bail

and similarly situated circumstances others have also

been granted the privilege by a Bench of this Court.

Considering the facts and circumstances of

the case, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a
2

period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be

enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs.

10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the

like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M.,

Sitamarhi, in connection with Piprahi P.S. Case No.

37 of 2011, subject to condition under section 438(2)

of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional

condition to attend the court regularly at least for two

years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier

and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates,

without any reasonable explanation, the privilege

granted shall be deemed to be cancelled.

Rajeev/                         ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)