Posted On by &filed under High Court, Madras High Court.

Madras High Court
Nayinakamen Bhattar And Anr. vs Madureswara Bhattar And Ors. on 17 January, 1885
Equivalent citations: (1895) 5 MLJ 58


1. We agree with the Subordinate Judge that the plaintiffs are not entitled to the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act. The first plaint was returned, as the suit as framed was beyond the jurisdiction of the District Munsif’s Court. They have now abandoned part of their claim and sued again in the same court. They might have done this at first. See Bikutti v. Kalendam (1890) I.L.R. 14 M. 467 and, Thirthasami v. Seshagiri Pai The suit is barred and the second appeal must be dismissed with costs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

93 queries in 0.164 seconds.